JBL Vibe Beam
JBL
62 종합 점수
vs
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
EarFun
93 종합 점수
점수
Budget
Gaming
Travel
Music
Fitness
Calls
Commute
사양
| JBL Vibe Beam | EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | Large, Medium, Small | s |
| Weight | 0.05 kg★ | 0.05 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | hybrid |
| Driver Size | 8 mm | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 2★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 100 dB | 100 dB |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | True Wireless, Long Battery Life | aptX Lossless, LDAC, LC3, LE Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive hybrid |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2★ | 6.0 |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | Bluetooth |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 12 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10min=2hrs | 10 min for 2 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 54 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | JBL Headphones App | EarFun Audio App |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✓★ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP54 | IP55 |
장단점
JBL Vibe Beam
- Strong connectivity (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong mic (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (76th percentile)
- Strong battery (73th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
결론
승자: EarFun Air Pro Air Pro 4+
Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 37 specs.