Leica SL SL3-S 2025
Leica
82 종합 점수
vs
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Brown
Kodak
23 종합 점수
점수
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Beginner
Youtube
Photography
Video
Product Photography
Streaming
Vlogging
Travel
사양
| Leica SL SL3-S | Kodak PIXPRO C1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Size | full-frame | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 24.600000381469727 MP★ | 13 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 | 100 |
| Processor | Maestro IV | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 데이터 없음 | |
| AF Type | PhotoContrast Detection: 315PhotoPhase Detection: 779 | TTL Autofocus |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | — |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 30 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/16000 | 1/10000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 6K★ | 1080p |
| 4K FPS | 60 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 100 fps★ | 60 fps |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | — |
| Log Profile | ✗ | — |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | — |
| Codec | H.265 Long GOP/MOV 4:2:0 10-Bit, H.264/H.265 Long GOP/MP4 4:2:0 8/10-Bit, H.264 ALL-Intra 4:2:2 10-Bit | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3.2"★ | 2.8" |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | 5.8M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.77 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Battery Life | 315 shots★ | 200 shots |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | USB-C (USB 3.2 / 3.1 Gen 2)★ | USB 2.0 (Type-C) |
| HDMI | HDMI Output | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓★ | — |
장단점
Leica SL SL3-S 2025
- Strong build (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong af (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong evf (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong video (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Brown
- Below average battery (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average build (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average sensor (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
가격
Leica SL SL3-S 20250.008달러당 점수
vs
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Brown0.124달러당 점수
Kodak PIXPRO C1 Brown 15.5배 더 나은 가성비
결론
승자: Leica SL SL3-S
Scores 82 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 19 of 32 specs.
