Motorola Edge + 2023 Review
The Motorola Edge+ (2023) offers flagship specs at a mid-range price, but our testing shows you make big compromises on the screen and camera to get them.
The 30-Second Version
A phone of contradictions. It packs high-end specs like a Snapdragon 8 and 512GB storage into a $355 package, but our data shows it falters where it counts. The display and camera are below average, making it a hard sell despite the tempting core hardware.
Overview
At $355, the Motorola Edge+ (2023) is a phone that makes you ask some hard questions about what you're really paying for. It's got a Snapdragon 8 chip and 512GB of storage, which sounds great on paper, but our data shows it lands in a weird middle ground. Its overall score puts it in the bottom quarter of phones we track, and it's particularly weak for anyone on a budget or looking for a rugged device.
Performance
The 'industry-leading Snapdragon 8' promise is a bit of a stretch here. Our performance ranking puts it at the 62nd percentile, which is basically middle of the pack. It's not slow, but it's not a standout either. You're getting solid, everyday speed, but don't expect it to top any benchmark charts. The 512GB storage is a genuine highlight, though, offering way more space than most phones at this price point.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Massive 512GB storage is rare at this price. 80th
- 5G connectivity scores well above average (80th percentile). 77th
- Good social proof with a 4.5/5 average rating from buyers.
- Unlocked and works on most carriers.
- The Snapdragon 8 chip provides reliable, if not leading, performance.
Cons
- Display quality is a weak spot, ranking in the bottom 30% of phones. 29th
- Battery and camera performance are both below average (35th percentile). 35th
- Build quality feels just average for a flagship-style phone (40th percentile).
- A terrible choice for rugged use, scoring in the bottom 12%.
- Not a good value for budget seekers, ranking in the bottom 25% for that category.
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Performance
| Storage | 512 GB |
Connectivity
| 5G | Yes |
Value & Pricing
The value argument is tricky. At $355 for a phone with a Snapdragon 8 and 512GB, it seems like a steal. But our scoring tells a different story. Its 'budget' score is awful, and its total score is low. This suggests you're paying for last year's flagship specs wrapped in a package with significant compromises, especially the display and camera. You're not getting a bad phone, but you might be getting a less complete experience than the core specs imply.
Price History
vs Competition
Stack it up against its peers and the trade-offs become clear. A used iPhone 16 Pro will likely destroy it in camera and display quality. The Google Pixel 10 Pro will offer a much more polished software experience and probably better computational photography. Even phones like the OnePlus 15 might offer a more balanced package for a similar price. The Edge+'s main advantage is that massive 512GB storage and unlocked flexibility, but you give up screen quality and camera prowess to get it.
| Spec | Motorola Edge + | Samsung Galaxy Samsung - Galaxy S26+ 256GB (Unlocked) - Black | Google Pixel Google - Pixel 10 Pro 256GB (Unlocked) - Obsidian | OnePlus OnePlus OnePlus - 15 512GB (Unlocked) - Infinite Black | Apple iPhone Apple - Pre-Owned Excellent iPhone 16 Pro 5G 128GB | 8849 Tank 8849 Tank 3 5G Rugged Smartphone, 23800mAh 6.79" |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | - | 6.7 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 6.3 | 6.8 |
| Display Type | - | OLED | OLED | OLED | OLED | - |
| Refresh Rate | - | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Processor | - | Snapdragon® 8 Elite Gen 5 for Galaxy | 3.78 GHz | 8 Elite Gen 5 | Apple A18 Pro | Octa-Core |
| RAM (GB) | - | 12 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 16 |
| Storage (GB) | 512 | 256 | 256 | 512 | 128 | 512 |
| Rear Camera Mp | - | 50 | 50 | 50 | 48 | 200 |
| Front Camera Mp | - | 12 | 42 | 32 | 12 | - |
| Battery Capacity Mah | - | 4900 | 4870 | 7300 | 3582 | - |
| Charging Wattage | - | 45 | - | - | - | - |
| Wireless Charging | - | true | false | - | true | false |
| Five (g) | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| Water Resistance | - | IP68 | IP68 | IP69 | IP68 | IP68 |
| Operating System | - | Android 16 | Android 16 | Android 16 | iPadOS 18 | Android |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Product | Build | Camera | Battery | Display | Feature | Performance | Connectivity | Social Proof |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Edge + | 40.2 | 34.8 | 35.3 | 28.8 | 42.9 | 61.7 | 79.8 | 76.6 |
| Samsung Galaxy S26+ Compare | 99.3 | 97.3 | 98.9 | 99.7 | 97.7 | 99.5 | 99.7 | 93.3 |
| Google Pixel 10 Pro Compare | 99.3 | 99 | 90 | 97.9 | 88.9 | 83.2 | 98.7 | 98 |
| OnePlus OnePlus 15 Compare | 92.7 | 99.8 | 98.6 | 97.7 | 94.7 | 100 | 99.5 | 99.8 |
| Apple iPhone Pre-Owned Excellent 16 Pro 5G Compare | 99.3 | 99.4 | 88.8 | 98.4 | 86.2 | 97.4 | 94.5 | 98 |
| 8849 Tank 8849 Tank 3 5G Rugged Compare | 92.7 | 86.5 | 70.5 | 92.6 | 96.9 | 84.7 | 87.5 | 92.6 |
Common Questions
Q: Is the Motorola Edge+ (2023) good for gaming?
The Snapdragon 8 chip is capable, but its overall performance ranking is just average (62nd percentile). It'll handle most games fine, but don't expect it to be a top-tier gaming phone, especially with its below-average display.
Q: How is the camera quality?
Our data ranks the camera performance in the bottom 35% of phones. It's a definite weak point. You'll get usable photos, but they won't compete with cameras from Google, Samsung, or Apple in this price range.
Q: Should I buy this or a newer mid-range phone?
It depends. This phone wins on raw storage (512GB) and has a theoretically faster chip. But a newer mid-ranger will likely have a better screen, better cameras, and longer software support. Our low 'feature' score (43rd percentile) suggests this Motorola is missing some modern amenities.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this phone if you care about screen quality, camera performance, or battery life. Our rankings show it lags behind most phones in display (29th percentile) and camera/battery (35th percentile). It's also a terrible choice if you need a rugged device—it scores in the bottom 12% for that. Basically, if you're not purely chasing the Snapdragon 8 + 512GB spec sheet for a low price, look elsewhere.
Verdict
We can't give this a full-throated recommendation. If your absolute top priorities are getting a Snapdragon 8 processor and half a terabyte of storage for under $400, and you're willing to accept a mediocre screen and so-so camera, then sure, this works. But for most people, that's a tough compromise to make. There are better-rounded phones out there that might offer less storage but a much better daily experience.