MSI MPG MSI 34" UWQHD 2K 1440P 240Hz with Adaptive Sync Review

The MSI MPG 346CQRF X24 ultrawide hits a 240Hz refresh rate at 3440x1440, landing it in the 99th performance percentile. For $380, it's a high-frame-rate gaming bargain with a few expected VA panel trade-offs.

Screen Size 34
Resolution 3440 x 1440
Panel Type VA
Refresh Rate 240
Response Time Ms 0.5
Adaptive Sync Adaptive-Sync
Hdr HDR400
MSI MPG MSI 34" UWQHD 2K 1440P 240Hz with Adaptive Sync monitor
82.1 総合スコア

The 30-Second Version

This 34" MSI ultrawide delivers a 240Hz refresh rate at 3440x1440, landing it in the 99th percentile for performance. For $380, it's a steal for high-frame-rate gaming. The trade-off is the expected VA panel behavior, but for the price, it's hard to beat.

Overview

The MSI MPG 346CQRF X24 is a 34-inch ultrawide that hits a 240Hz refresh rate at 3440x1440. That combination puts its performance in the 99th percentile of monitors in our database. For $380, you're getting a spec sheet that was flagship-tier a couple years ago, now at a very aggressive price. It's a curved VA panel with a 1500R curve, 0.5ms GtG response time, and HDR400 support, making it a focused gaming machine that also scores well for professional and entertainment use.

Performance

Let's talk about that 99th percentile performance score. A 240Hz refresh rate at UWQHD resolution is still a high bar, and this monitor clears it. In practical terms, that means buttery-smooth motion clarity in fast-paced games where every frame counts. The 0.5ms GtG response time helps minimize ghosting, though VA panels can sometimes show a bit of smearing in dark transitions. The color performance is also strong, landing in the 93rd percentile with 400 nits brightness and HDR400 certification. It's not going to compete with OLED for pure contrast, but for a VA panel, it holds its own.

Performance Percentiles

Color 92.4
Portability 8.1
Display 81.8
Feature 84.4
Ergonomic 87.8
Performance 98.8
Connectivity 90.3
Social Proof 52.1

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Blazing 240Hz refresh rate at UWQHD (99th percentile performance). 99th
  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio at $380. 92th
  • Strong color and brightness for a VA panel (93rd percentile color). 90th
  • Good ergonomic stand with height, tilt, and swivel adjustment (88th percentile). 88th
  • Solid connectivity with two HDMI and a DisplayPort (91st percentile).

Cons

  • VA panel may show some black smearing compared to IPS or OLED. 8th
  • HDR400 is entry-level HDR; don't expect mini-LED performance.
  • It's a large, curved monitor, so portability is basically non-existent (8th percentile).
  • Lacks USB-C connectivity, which is becoming more common.
  • Social proof score is just average (51st percentile), meaning it's not a mainstream crowd-pleaser yet.

The Word on the Street

4.7/5 (8 reviews)
👍 Buyers are consistently impressed with the monitor's picture quality, describing colors as crisp and clear for the price.
👍 The high 240Hz refresh rate is a major highlight for gamers, with users reporting smooth gameplay without noticeable ghosting.
🤔 Some users note that the monitor's brightness, while good, isn't its strongest suit and could be higher for some environments.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Display

Size 34"
Resolution 3440 x 1440
Panel Type VA
Aspect Ratio 21:9
Curvature 1500

Performance

Refresh Rate 240 Hz
Response Time 0.5
Adaptive Sync Adaptive-Sync

Color & HDR

Brightness 400 nits
HDR HDR400
HDR Support HDR400

Connectivity

HDMI Ports 2
DisplayPort 1
Speakers No

Ergonomics

Height Adjustable Yes
Tilt Yes
Swivel Yes
Pivot No
VESA Mount 100x100

Features

Webcam No

Value & Pricing

At $380, this monitor is punching way above its weight class. You're getting a high-refresh-rate ultrawide with specs that often cost $600 or more. The value proposition here is simple: maximum frames per dollar in an immersive 21:9 format. MSI has essentially taken last generation's premium tech and priced it for the mid-range, and it's a move we can get behind.

Price History

$200 $300 $400 $500 $600 Mar 9Mar 9Mar 21Mar 23Mar 24 $380

vs Competition

Compared to the Samsung Odyssey Neo G9, you're giving up mini-LED backlighting and a super-ultrawide aspect ratio for a much lower price and a more standard ultrawide size. Against the ASUS ROG Swift 32" 4K QD-OLED, you're trading infinite contrast and perfect blacks for a higher refresh rate and no risk of burn-in, again at a fraction of the cost. The MSI 32" 4K 240Hz competitor from their own lineup offers sharper pixels but demands even more from your GPU. This 34" model strikes a smart balance between resolution, refresh rate, and affordability.

Common Questions

Q: Is this monitor worth buying for gaming?

Absolutely, if your PC can push high frame rates. Its 99th percentile performance score comes from the 240Hz refresh rate at UWQHD, which is ideal for competitive and fast-paced games.

Q: Is the screen curved or flat?

It's curved with a 1500R curvature, which is fairly aggressive and designed to wrap the ultrawide view around your field of vision for immersion.

Q: What kind of panel does it use, and how does it affect the image?

It uses a Rapid VA panel. This gives you good contrast and strong color (93rd percentile), but typical VA traits like potential black smearing in fast dark scenes are part of the package.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this monitor if you're a pixel-perfect creative professional who needs absolute color accuracy or an OLED-level contrast ratio. Also, if you have a tiny desk or need to move your setup around, its large, curved form factor and 8th percentile portability score make it a poor fit. And if your GPU can't reliably push beyond 100 fps in your games, you're paying for a 240Hz refresh rate you won't fully use.

Verdict

If you want a high-refresh-rate ultrawide for gaming without spending a fortune, this MSI is a fantastic choice. The 240Hz refresh rate is its killer feature, and the overall package is well-rounded with good color and ergonomics. Just know that VA panel limitations are part of the deal, and if perfect black response is your top priority, you might want to look at IPS or OLED—though you'll pay a lot more for similar speed.