HP E24 G5 23.8" Black
HP
43 総合スコア
vs
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA 57" Black
Samsung
97 総合スコア
スコア
Gaming
Entertainment
Office
Professional
Creative
Portable
スペック
| HP E24 G5 23.8" | Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA 57" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 23.8" | 57" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 7680x2160 |
| Panel Type | IPS★ | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 32:9 |
| Curved | — | ✓ |
| Curvature | — | 1,000 |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 75 Hz | 240 Hz★ |
| Response Time | 5 ms | 1 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | — | FreeSync Premium Pro★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 420 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 72% NTSC | DCI-P3 95% |
| Color Depth | — | 12-bit |
| HDR | — | DisplayHDR 1000 |
| HDR Support | — | HDR10+★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 1 | 3★ |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | — | 2★ |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 2 | 0 |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | — | ✓★ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pivot | ✓★ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100 mm x 100 mm | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | — | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | — | ✓★ |
| Power | 53W★ | 300W |
| Weight | 6.30 kg★ | 19.01 kg |
長所と短所
HP E24 G5 23.8" Black
- Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong connectivity (75th percentile)
- Strong social proof (65th percentile)
- Below average color (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (20th percentile)20th %ile
- Below average display (22th percentile)
- Below average feature (24th percentile)
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA 57" Black
- Strong display (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (97th percentile)97th %ile
価格
HP E24 G5 23.8" Black0.105ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA 57" Black0.044ドルあたりのスコア
HP E24 G5 23.8" Black 2.4倍のコストパフォーマンス
HP E24 G5 23.8" Black
Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA 57" Black
結論
勝者: Samsung Odyssey Neo G9 LS57CG952NNXZA 57"
Scores 97 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 30 specs.
