HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14" Touchscreen Mobile Workstation 2.8K
HP
85 総合スコア
vs
ASUS ROG Flow 13.4" Z13 2025
ASUS
89 総合スコア
スコア
Entertainment
Compact
Creator
Student
Business
Developer
Gaming
スペック
| HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14" Touchscreen Mobile Workstation 2.8K | ASUS ROG Flow 13.4" Z13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 380 | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 6 | 16★ |
| Frequency | 3.6 GHz★ | 3.0 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 64 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Graphics | 8060★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | データなし | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | 48 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR6★ | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB | 1 TB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD | NVMe SSD |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 13.4" |
| Resolution | 2880 px★ | 2560 px |
| Panel | OLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz | 180 Hz★ |
| Brightness | 400 nits | 500 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 100% DCI-P3 | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| HDMI | 1 x HDMI | 1x HDMI 2.1 Output |
| Wi-Fi | WiFi 7 | WiFi 7 |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 2.73 kg | 1.20 kg★ |
| Battery | 74 Wh★ | 70 Wh |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Windows 11 Pro |
長所と短所
HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14" Touchscreen Mobile Workstation 2.8K
- Strong gpu (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong screen (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average reliability (29th percentile)
ASUS ROG Flow 13.4" Z13 2025
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong compact (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong screen (89th percentile)89th %ile
価格
HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14" Touchscreen Mobile Workstation 2.8K0.046ドルあたりのスコア
vs
ASUS ROG Flow 13.4" Z13 20250.030ドルあたりのスコア
HP ZBook Ultra G1a 14" Touchscreen Mobile Workstation 2.8K 1.5倍のコストパフォーマンス
ASUS ROG Flow 13.4" Z13 2025
結論
勝者: ASUS ROG Flow 13.4" Z13
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 27 specs.
