Timekettle W4 Pro
Timekettle
26 総合スコア
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 総合スコア
スコア
Calls
Travel
Music
Budget
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
スペック
| Timekettle W4 Pro | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | — | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.02 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs★ | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 1 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 3 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | Timekettle | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IPX4 |
長所と短所
Timekettle W4 Pro
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong build (79th percentile)
- Below average social proof (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average battery (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (29th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
価格
Timekettle W4 Pro0.047ドルあたりのスコア
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.294ドルあたりのスコア
Technics EAH-AZ100 6.3倍のコストパフォーマンス
結論
勝者: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 37 specs.
