BenQ GW3290QT 32" White 2023

BenQ GW3290QT 32" White 2023

BenQ
72 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025

Samsung
95 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Creative
BenQ
66
Samsung
84
Office
BenQ
84
Samsung
84
Gaming
BenQ
55
Samsung
84
Professional
BenQ
79
Samsung
83
Entertainment
BenQ
48
Samsung
76
Portable
BenQ
15
Samsung
14

Specifiche

BenQ GW3290QT 32"Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"
Display
Size31.5"27"
Resolution2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Panel TypeIPSQD-OLED
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate75 Hz500 Hz
Response Time5 ms0.029999999329447746 ms
Adaptive SyncFreeSync Premium Pro
Color & HDR
Brightness350 nits300 nits
Color Gamut99% sRGB99% DCI-P3
Color Depth8-bit10-bit
HDRHDR10+
HDR SupportHDR10+
Connectivity
HDMI Ports12
DisplayPort11
USB-C13
ThunderboltN/A
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power25W140W
Weight8.40 kg6.90 kg

Pro e Contro

BenQ GW3290QT 32" White 2023

  • Strong connectivity (93th percentile)93th %ile
  • Strong social proof (91th percentile)91th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong compact (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average feature (23th percentile)

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025

  • Strong performance (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong color (94th percentile)94th %ile

Prezzi

BenQ GW3290QT 32" White 2023 is 907 CA$ cheaper (3.0x less).

BenQ GW3290QT 32" White 20230.156punteggio per dollaro
vs
Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 20250.070punteggio per dollaro

BenQ GW3290QT 32" White 2023 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 2.2x migliore

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Silver 2025

Verdetto

Vincitore: Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27"

Scores 95 overall, wins 4 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 29 specs.

Samsung Odyssey OLED G6 G60SF 27" Migliore per:

GamingCreativeProfessionalEntertainment

Da considerare anche