MSI MAG MAG255XFV 25" Black 2024
MSI
70 Punteggio complessivo
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 21.5" Black 2025
ASUS
88 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Gaming
Professional
Office
Creative
Entertainment
Portable
Specifiche
| MSI MAG MAG255XFV 25" | ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 21.5" | |
|---|---|---|
| Display | ||
| Size | 25" | 31.5" |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Panel Type | VA | IPS★ |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 | 16:9 |
| Curved | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Refresh Rate | 250 Hz★ | 160 Hz |
| Response Time | 0.5 ms | 0.30000001192092896 ms★ |
| Adaptive Sync | Adaptive-Sync | FreeSync Premium★ |
| Color & HDR | ||
| Brightness | 250 nits | 400 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | 82% Adobe RGB, 78% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB | 95% DCI-P3 |
| Color Depth | 8-bit (8-bit + FRC) | 8-bit (8-Bit+FRC) |
| HDR | HDR Ready | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR | HDR10★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| HDMI Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| DisplayPort | 1 | 1 |
| USB-C | 0 | 1★ |
| Speakers | ✗ | ✗ |
| Headphone Jack | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ergonomics | ||
| Height Adjustable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Tilt | ✓ | ✓ |
| Swivel | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Pivot | ✗ | ✗ |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 | 100x100 |
| Features | ||
| Webcam | ✗ | ✗ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✗ |
| PIP/PBP | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Power | 36W | 30W★ |
| Weight | 3.28 kg★ | 9.90 kg |
Pro e Contro
MSI MAG MAG255XFV 25" Black 2024
- Strong performance (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong color (70th percentile)
- Below average display (30th percentile)
- Below average compact (32th percentile)
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 21.5" Black 2025
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong performance (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong color (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
Prezzi
MSI MAG MAG255XFV 25" Black 20240.467punteggio per dollaro
vs
ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 21.5" Black 20250.108punteggio per dollaro
MSI MAG MAG255XFV 25" Black 2024 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 4.3x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: ASUS ROG Strix XG32UCG 21.5"
Scores 88 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 28 specs.
