Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 Gray 2025
Acer
62 Punteggio complessivo
vs
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a Pike Silver
HP
55 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Compact
Student
Entertainment
Business
Developer
Creator
Gaming
Specifiche
| Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 | HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU* | Intel Core Ultra 7 256V | AMD Ryzen 5 230★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | ||
| Cores | 8★ | 6 |
| Frequency | 2.2 GHz | 3.5 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB | 16 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | Intel Arc 140V★ | AMD Radeon 760M |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Dati non disponibili | |
| Type | integrated★ | discrete |
| VRAM | 16 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | LPDDR5X | DDR5 |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 256 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 14" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 1920 px |
| Panel | — | IPS★ |
| Refresh Rate | — | 60 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 62.5% sRGB |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | 4★ | 2 |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E | Wi-Fi 6E |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth | 5.3★ |
| Ethernet | — | Gigabit Ethernet |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.40 kg | 1.40 kg★ |
| Battery | — | 56 Wh★ |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Pro |
Pro e Contro
Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 Gray 2025
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong compact (77th percentile)
- Strong storage (69th percentile)
- Strong cpu (66th percentile)
- Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a Pike Silver
- Strong compact (78th percentile)
- Strong port (78th percentile)
- Strong cpu (67th percentile)
- Below average social proof (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average storage (26th percentile)
- Below average reliability (32th percentile)
Prezzi
Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0 Gray 2025
No current pricing available
HP ProBook 14" 4 G1a Pike Silver
Verdetto
Vincitore: Acer Aspire 14" A14-52M-72S0
Scores 62 overall, wins 4 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 29 specs.
