JBL Junior 320BT
JBL
89 Punteggio complessivo
vs
Apple EarPods
Apple
23 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Gaming
Work
Music
Commute
Calls
Studio
Specifiche
| JBL Junior 320BT | Apple EarPods | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.23 kg★ | — |
| Ear Cushion | Leather | — |
| Headband | fabric | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 40 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | — |
| Sensitivity | 80 dB★ | — |
| Max SPL | 81 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | — |
| Profiles | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | Lightning |
| Detachable Cable | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs★ | — |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 5min=4hrs | — |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Capacity | 500 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 4★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Alexa, Google Assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | JBL Headphones | — |
| Volume Limiting | ✓★ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | no | Yes |
Pro e Contro
JBL Junior 320BT
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong comfort (92th percentile)92th %ile
Apple EarPods
- Below average connectivity (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average sound (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
Prezzi
JBL Junior 320BT1.442punteggio per dollaro
vs
Apple EarPods0.924punteggio per dollaro
JBL Junior 320BT offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 1.6x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: JBL Junior 320BT
Scores 89 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 23 of 40 specs.
