Samsung ME542
Samsung
58 Punteggio complessivo
vs
SoundPEATS H3
SoundPEATS
88 Punteggio complessivo
Punteggi
Budget
Travel
Gaming
Fitness
Music
Calls
Commute
Specifiche
| Samsung ME542 | SoundPEATS H3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | half-in-ear | true wireless |
| Weight | 0.03 kg★ | 0.20 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | hybrid |
| Driver Size | 14.199999809265137 mm★ | 12 mm |
| Drivers | — | 3★ |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 28 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 110 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codecs | — | LDAC, aptX Lossless |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive hybrid |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 minutes for 2 hours playback |
| Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 37 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C★ | — |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | voice assistant | — |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | PeatsAudio App |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX5 |
Pro e Contro
Samsung ME542
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong sound (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong mic (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong social proof (69th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average build (33th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (34th percentile)
SoundPEATS H3
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (92th percentile)92th %ile
Prezzi
Samsung ME5421.847punteggio per dollaro
vs
SoundPEATS H30.552punteggio per dollaro
Samsung ME542 offre un rapporto qualità-prezzo 3.3x migliore
Verdetto
Vincitore: SoundPEATS H3
Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 9 of 33 specs.
