BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024

BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024

BEASTCOM
51 Punteggio complessivo
vs
MSI Aegis ZS2 C9NVV-1276US Black 2025

MSI Aegis ZS2 C9NVV-1276US Black 2025

MSI
82 Punteggio complessivo

Punteggi

Gaming
BEASTCOM
13
MSI
92
Creator
BEASTCOM
21
MSI
87
Workstation
BEASTCOM
45
MSI
83
Home Office
BEASTCOM
55
MSI
82
Developer
BEASTCOM
42
MSI
79
Business
BEASTCOM
48
MSI
74
Compact
BEASTCOM
19
MSI
27

Specifiche

BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515MSI Aegis ZS2 C9NVV-1276US
Processor
CPU4.6 GHz ryzen_7AMD Ryzen 7 9800X
CPU Multi-Core ScoreDati non disponibili
18,140
Cores88
Frequency4.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L3 Cache96 MB
Graphics
GPUIntegrated GraphicsNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
GPU Benchmark ScoreDati non disponibili
35,759
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM8 GB16 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB64 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 11 TB2 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDNVMe SSD
Build
Form FactorTowermid-tower
PSU850W
Weight8.69 kg12.20 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports1
USB Ports5
Thunderbolt0
HDMIHDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort3x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pro e Contro

BEASTCOM Q3 Q3-515 2024

  • Strong cpu (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average ram (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average port (21th percentile)

MSI Aegis ZS2 C9NVV-1276US Black 2025

  • Strong ram (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong storage (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong port (72th percentile)

Verdetto

Vincitore: MSI Aegis ZS2 C9NVV-1276US

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 26 specs.

MSI Aegis ZS2 C9NVV-1276US Migliore per:

GamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation