Samyang Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II Lens for Sony E-Mount Review
The Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II delivers beautiful bokeh but struggles with slow, noisy autofocus. At $649, it's a tough sell when better all-around options exist.
The 30-Second Version
Buy this lens only if you're obsessed with f/1.4 bokeh on a budget and can live with mediocre autofocus. For everyone else, the Sigma 35mm f/2 or Sony 35mm f/1.8 are smarter buys that won't leave you frustrated.
Overview
The Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II is a lens that feels like it's trying to be two things at once, and it's not entirely successful at either. The one thing you need to know is this: you're buying it for the f/1.4 aperture and the potential for beautiful bokeh, and you're tolerating everything else. It's a classic 'fast fifty' equivalent for full-frame Sony shooters, but our data shows it's a niche tool, not a do-it-all lens. It's built for low-light and shallow depth-of-field work, and if that's your jam, keep reading. If you need a lens that's great at everything, look elsewhere.
Performance
Let's talk about the surprise, and it's not a great one. The autofocus lands in the 46th percentile in our database. That's below average, and it shows. For a lens that costs $649, you'd expect snappy, reliable AF, especially for street or portrait work where that f/1.4 focus plane is razor-thin. We're hearing from users that it can hunt in low light, and the motor isn't the quietest. On the flip side, the optical performance at f/1.4 is surprisingly decent for the price—it's sharp in the center, and the bokeh quality is in the 91st percentile. So, the lens delivers where it absolutely has to (the image), but stumbles on the modern convenience (the focus).
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong bokeh (91th percentile) 91th
- Strong aperture (88th percentile) 88th
- Strong optical (84th percentile) 84th
- Strong macro (66th percentile) 66th
Cons
The Word on the Street
Specifications
Full Specifications
Optics
| Focal Length Min | 35 |
| Focal Length Max | 35 |
| Elements | 11 |
| Groups | 9 |
| Coating | UMC |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 |
| Min Aperture | f/16 |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 |
Build
| Mount | Sony E |
| Format | Full-Frame |
| Weight | 0.7 kg / 1.5 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 67 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 290 |
| Max Magnification | 1:5.55 |
Value & Pricing
At $649, the value proposition is shaky. You're paying a premium for the f/1.4 aperture in a native Sony mount. The optical results can be great, but you're making sacrifices in AF performance, portability, and features like weather sealing. If your budget is tight and you must have f/1.4, it's an option. If you can live with f/1.8 or f/2, you can get a better all-around lens for the same money or less.
vs Competition
You have to look at the Sony 35mm f/1.8 and the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN. The Sony is more expensive, but it's lighter, has better autofocus, and includes optical stabilization. For most people, it's the better daily driver. The Sigma is similarly priced, sharper across the frame, has better build quality with weather sealing, and its autofocus is in a different league. The Rokinon only wins if your absolute top priority is that extra 2/3 of a stop of light from f/1.4 and you're on a strict budget. Even then, consider a used first-party lens.
| Spec | Samyang Rokinon 35mm f/1.4 AF II Lens for Sony E-Mount | Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF | Viltrox VILTROX 25mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Lens for Fuji X Mount, | Canon Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens | Nikon Nikon S-Line Nikon NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S II Lens (Nikon Z) | Tamron Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 35mm | 55mm | 25mm | 24mm | 24-70mm | 17-70mm |
| Max Aperture | f/1.4 | f/1.4 | f/1.7 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | Sony E | Nikon Z | Fujifilm X | Canon RF | Nikon Z | Sony E Mount |
| Stabilization | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | false | false | false | true | false |
| Weight (g) | 658 | 281 | 400 | 269 | 676 | 544 |
| AF Type | Autofocus | STM | STM | Autofocus | Autofocus | Autofocus |
| Lens Type | - | - | - | Zoom | Zoom | Zoom |
Common Questions
Q: Is the autofocus really that bad on a Sony A7III?
It's not 'bad' in the sense that it fails, but it's definitely slower and noisier than a native Sony or Sigma lens. For single-shot portraits, it's fine. For continuous AF or video, you'll notice it struggling.
Q: What's the deal with Rokinon vs. Samyang?
They're the same company. This lens is identical to the Samyang 35mm f/1.4 AF II. Just buy whichever brand is cheaper or has the better warranty where you live.
Q: Should I get this or the Sony 35mm f/1.8?
Get the Sony. It's more money, but you're paying for vastly better autofocus, image stabilization, lighter weight, and peace of mind. The Rokinon's f/1.4 advantage isn't worth the trade-offs for most people.
Who Should Skip This
If you're a hybrid shooter who does video, a traveler who values a light kit, or anyone who needs dead-reliable autofocus for moving subjects, this isn't it. Go get the Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN instead. It's sharper, better built, sealed, and focuses like a dream.
Verdict
We can't give this a full-throated recommendation. It's a lens for a very specific photographer: someone who shoots mostly static subjects in controlled or low-light environments, values bokeh quality above all else, and doesn't rely on fast or silent autofocus. For everyone else—especially hybrid shooters, travelers, or anyone needing reliable AF—the competition from Sigma and Sony is just better. This lens feels like a previous generation, and at this price, that's hard to justify.