Samyang Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) Review

The Samyang 135mm f/2 delivers stunning portrait bokeh at a budget price, but manual focus only makes it a niche choice. Here's who should buy it.

Focal Length 135mm
Max Aperture f/2
Mount Canon EF
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 830 g
Samyang Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 ED UMC Lens (Canon EF) lens
60 ओवरऑल स्कोर

Overview

If you're a Canon shooter looking for a dedicated portrait lens that won't break the bank, the Samyang Rokinon 135mm f/2.0 is a classic choice. It's a manual focus prime lens designed for full-frame cameras, giving you that beautiful, compressed look with a super bright f/2 aperture. At 830 grams, it's a solid chunk of glass, and with a 77mm filter thread, it fits a lot of common accessories. People often ask, 'is the Rokinon 135mm good for portraits?' The short answer is yes, that's exactly what it's built for. Its 64.8/100 score for portrait work confirms it's a specialist, not a jack-of-all-trades.

Performance

This lens is all about the image quality, and it delivers. The optics score lands in the 65th percentile, and you can see it in the sharpness and color rendition. The bokeh, or background blur, is a real highlight, sitting in the 73rd percentile. That f/2 aperture at 135mm lets you isolate your subject beautifully, creating those creamy, out-of-focus backgrounds portrait photographers love. Just remember, there's no autofocus or image stabilization here. You're in full control, which is great for deliberate work but means it's not the best for fast-moving subjects.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.1
Bokeh 76.6
Build 21.2
Macro 48.3
Optical 72.2
Aperture 68.9
Versatility 37.5
Social Proof 93.3
Stabilization 37.7

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Excellent bokeh quality for creamy backgrounds 93th
  • Bright f/2.0 aperture for low light and shallow depth of field 77th
  • Good optical performance with sharp, clear images 72th
  • Relatively affordable for a fast telephoto prime 69th
  • Solid, all-metal construction feels durable

Cons

  • Manual focus only, which can be slow for some 21th
  • No image stabilization, so you need a steady hand or high shutter speed
  • Build quality percentile is low (18th), meaning it lacks weather sealing and feels a bit basic
  • Heavy and bulky at 830g, not ideal for travel
  • Minimum focus distance of 790mm isn't great for close-up details

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 135
Focal Length Max 135
Elements 11
Groups 7

Aperture

Max Aperture f/2
Min Aperture f/22
Diaphragm Blades 9

Build

Mount Canon EF
Format Full-Frame
Weight 0.8 kg / 1.8 lbs
Filter Thread 77

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 790

Value & Pricing

At around $449, the Samyang 135mm f/2 sits in a interesting spot. It's significantly cheaper than first-party options from Canon, like the EF 135mm f/2L, which costs over twice as much. You're paying for the optical formula and the fast aperture, but you're giving up autofocus, weather sealing, and that premium 'L' series build. For a photographer on a budget who doesn't mind manual focus, it's a compelling way to get professional-looking portrait results.

vs Competition

Let's talk alternatives. If you need autofocus, the Canon EF 135mm f/2L is the obvious upgrade, but it's a big price jump. For Sony shooters, the Viltrox 135mm f/1.8 offers autofocus and a slightly brighter aperture for a similar price, making it a more modern competitor. The listed competitors like the Viltrox 35mm or Panasonic 14-140mm are different beasts entirely—they're wider or zoom lenses. Comparing the Samyang 135mm to them is like comparing a sports car to an SUV; the Samyang is a specialized tool for a specific job (portraits), while the others are more about flexibility.

Verdict

So, should you buy the Samyang Rokinon 135mm f/2.0? If you shoot portraits on a Canon DSLR and you're comfortable with manual focus, this lens is a fantastic value. The image quality, especially the bokeh, is genuinely great. But if you shoot events, sports, or anything where quick focusing is critical, the lack of autofocus is a deal-breaker. It's also not a travel lens—it's heavy and lacks versatility. Think of it as a budget studio lens. If that's your niche, it's a smart buy. If you need an all-rounder, look elsewhere.