Lenovo PTLO1
Lenovo
28 Score global
vs
JBL Junior Junior 320BT
JBL
57 Score global
Scores
Budget
Gaming
Music
Work
Commute
Calls
Studio
Spécifications
| Lenovo PTLO1 | JBL Junior Junior 320BT | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | on-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | — | closed |
| Foldable | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg | 0.12 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | Fabric | — |
| Headband | 80% Nylon and 20% Spandex | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic Driver | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 30 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 80 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 81 dB★ |
| Codecs | Noise Isolation, Wireless Connectivity, Ambient Noise Block Out | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✗ |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 12 hrs | 50 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Fast Charging | — | 5 Minutes for 3 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 500 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 1★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓★ | ✗ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✓★ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Lenovo PTLO1
- Strong connectivity (68th percentile)
- Strong comfort (66th percentile)
- Below average battery (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average mic (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average social proof (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average sound (18th percentile)18th %ile
JBL Junior Junior 320BT
- Strong comfort (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong battery (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong connectivity (75th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
- Below average build (35th percentile)
Prix
Lenovo PTLO10.647score par dollar
vs
JBL Junior Junior 320BT0.929score par dollar
JBL Junior Junior 320BT offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.4x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: JBL Junior Junior 320BT
Scores 57 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 32 specs.
