Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II Review

The Nikon Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II creates some of the creamiest bokeh you'll ever see, but you'll pay for it with manual focus, huge weight, and a $1200 price tag.

Focal Length 58mm
Max Aperture f/1.5
Mount Nikon Z
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 1361 g
Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II lens
32.9 Puntuación global

Overview

So you're looking at the Nikon Meyer-Optik Gorlitz Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II. This is a weird, heavy, and frankly fascinating piece of glass. It's a modern remake of a classic lens design, but built for Nikon's Z-mount. At 1361 grams, it's a chonker. You're not buying this for a walk-around kit. You're buying it for the look.

This lens is for portrait photographers and filmmakers who want a specific, vintage-inspired character in their images. The f/1.5 aperture is fast, but the real story is the 14-blade diaphragm. That's a ton of blades, and it's all about creating super smooth, circular bokeh balls. The lens scores a 71 out of 100 for portraits, which tells you exactly where it shines.

It's a fully manual focus lens, so forget about autofocus. That's a deal-breaker for some, but for others, it's part of the charm and the control. It's also not stabilized, not weather-sealed, and it's definitely not a travel lens, scoring a dismal 12.7 in that category. This is a tool for controlled, deliberate shooting where the final image character matters more than convenience.

Performance

Let's talk about what those percentile rankings mean. The bokeh quality is in the 96th percentile. That's exceptional. It means the out-of-focus areas this lens produces are smoother and more pleasing than almost anything else out there. The f/1.5 aperture sits in the 81st percentile, so it's plenty fast for isolating subjects and shooting in low light. But that's where the high scores end.

The optical performance percentile is only 33rd. That's the kicker. This lens isn't clinically sharp corner-to-corner. It has character, which often means some softness, vignetting, or other optical 'flaws' that people actually seek out for a vintage look. The autofocus percentile is 48th, but that's a bit misleading since it has no autofocus at all. The build quality is in the 10th percentile, which aligns with its all-metal, old-school construction that feels solid but isn't filled with modern seals or coatings.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.4
Bokeh 97.5
Build 12
Macro 21.7
Optical 34.6
Aperture 82
Versatility 37.5
Social Proof 13
Stabilization 37.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Bokeh quality is in the top 4% of all lenses (96th percentile), producing incredibly smooth, circular out-of-focus highlights. 98th
  • Very fast f/1.5 aperture (81st percentile) for great subject isolation and low-light capability. 82th
  • 14-blade diaphragm ensures perfectly round bokeh balls even when stopped down several stops.
  • Manual focus design offers precise, tactile control for portraits and video work.
  • Unique, vintage-inspired optical character that modern 'perfect' lenses often lack.

Cons

  • No autofocus. You're focusing manually every single time, which is slow for anything but deliberate shots. 12th
  • Extremely heavy at 1361g (almost 3 pounds). This will noticeably unbalance smaller Z-mount cameras. 13th
  • Build quality ranks in the bottom 10% (10th percentile), lacking modern weather sealing or robust coatings. 22th
  • Optical performance is only in the 33rd percentile, meaning it's not particularly sharp or corrected compared to modern lenses. 35th
  • A terrible travel lens (12.7/100 score) due to its weight, manual focus, and lack of versatility.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 58
Focal Length Max 58

Aperture

Max Aperture f/1.5
Min Aperture f/16
Diaphragm Blades 14

Build

Mount Nikon Z
Format Full-Frame
Weight 1.4 kg / 3.0 lbs
Filter Thread 52

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Value & Pricing

At $1199, this lens is a niche product priced for its character, not its specs. You're not paying for sharpness, autofocus, or lightweight design. You're paying for that 96th-percentile bokeh and the unique rendering you can't get from a standard 50mm f/1.8. It's expensive for what it is on paper, but if the look is exactly what you need, there aren't many alternatives that offer this specific combination of focal length, speed, and bokeh quality in a native Z-mount.

Compared to a Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S, which is sharper, lighter, has autofocus, and costs less, the Biotar seems like a bad deal. But the Z 50mm f/1.8 S won't give you the Biotar's look. That's the trade-off. This lens's value is entirely subjective and tied to how much you desire its specific rendering.

1646 CAD

vs Competition

Let's name some competitors. The Meike 55mm F1.8 Pro is a full-frame AF lens for Z-mount at a fraction of the price. It gives you autofocus and a similar focal length, but its bokeh and character are completely different—more modern and clinical. The Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 Z is another affordable AF option, but wider. It's for a different job.

The real comparison is against other manual focus, character lenses. Something like a used Voigtlander 50mm f/1.2 might get you in the ballpark for less money, but it's not native Z-mount without an adapter. The Biotar's main advantage is being a dedicated, modern-built version of a classic design for the Z system. If you want autofocus and versatility, look at the Panasonic 14-140mm or the Sony 24-240mm. But if you want the Biotar's look, those zooms can't touch it, even though they score higher in 'versatility'.

Spec Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus
Focal Length 58mm 55mm 35mm 17-70mm 24mm -
Max Aperture f/1.5 f/1.4 f/1.7 f/2.8 f/1.8 f/1.4
Mount Nikon Z Nikon Z Fujifilm X Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M Canon RF Fujifilm X
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false false true
Weight (g) 1361 281 400 544 272 320
AF Type - STM STM Autofocus Autofocus STM
Lens Type - - - Wide-Angle Zoom Wide-Angle -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II 46.497.51221.734.68237.51337.9
Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare 95.681.881.289.167.588.137.589.987.7
Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare 95.673.663.593.27480.637.595.187.7
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare 46.459.264.477.490.854.692.595.187.7
Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare 46.481.887.78182.575.837.59899.9
Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Standard Prime Compare 95.681.888.985.234.688.137.586.787.7

Verdict

Here's the bottom line. Buy the Nikon Meyer-Optik Gorlitz Biotar 58mm f/1.5 II if you are a portrait shooter or filmmaker who values unique, vintage-inspired bokeh above all else. You need to be okay with manual focus, a very heavy lens, and optical imperfections. This is a tool for creating a specific look, not an all-arounder.

Do not buy this lens if you need autofocus, shoot in changing conditions, travel light, or prioritize edge-to-edge sharpness. For most people, a modern AF prime like the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S is a better, more practical choice. But for that small group who sees the world in those swirly, creamy bokeh balls, this lens is basically the only game in town for Nikon Z.