Samyang 24mm f/1.4 ED AS UMC Wide-Angle Review

The Samyang 24mm f/1.4 has great glass, but it's built for the wrong camera system. It's too big, too heavy, and not worth the hassle for Micro Four Thirds shooters.

Focal Length 24mm
Max Aperture f/1.4
Mount Four Thirds
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 953 g
Samyang 24mm f/1.4 ED AS UMC Wide-Angle lens
57.1 Overall Score

Overview

This Samyang 24mm f/1.4 is a weird one. It's a massive, heavy prime lens built for full-frame cameras, but it's only sold in a mount for tiny Four Thirds cameras. That's the one thing you need to know. If you're looking for a sharp, fast wide-angle for your Micro Four Thirds camera, you can get better options that actually fit the system.

Performance

The optical performance is surprisingly good, landing in the 83rd percentile. The f/1.4 aperture is fantastic for low light and shallow depth of field, scoring in the 88th percentile. But the autofocus is just average, sitting at the 49th percentile, and it's completely missing stabilization. For a lens this heavy, you'd expect more.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.4
Bokeh 87.2
Build 18
Macro 70.2
Optical 84
Aperture 88.1
Versatility 37.5
Stabilization 37.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Fantastic f/1.4 aperture for low light and bokeh. 88th
  • Sharp optics that score well above average. 87th
  • Solid build quality, though it's very heavy. 84th
  • Good for portraits and creative macro work. 70th

Cons

  • It's absurdly heavy and large for a Micro Four Thirds lens. 18th
  • No image stabilization, which hurts handheld shooting.
  • Autofocus is just okay, not great for fast action.
  • Terrible for travel due to its size and weight.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 24
Focal Length Max 24
Elements 13
Groups 12

Aperture

Max Aperture f/1.4
Min Aperture f/22
Diaphragm Blades 8

Build

Mount Four Thirds
Format Four Thirds
Weight 1.0 kg / 2.1 lbs
Filter Thread 77

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 250

Value & Pricing

At $549, it's not worth it. You're paying for a full-frame optical design crammed into the wrong mount. That money gets you native Micro Four Thirds lenses that are sharper, faster to focus, and a fraction of the size and weight.

CA$753

vs Competition

For a similar fast prime, the Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 is a much better fit for the system. It's smaller, lighter, and has autofocus. If you need a versatile zoom, the Panasonic 14-140mm covers a huge range and has stabilization, making it a far better travel lens. The Samyang feels like a solution to a problem that doesn't exist on Micro Four Thirds.

Spec Samyang 24mm f/1.4 ED AS UMC Wide-Angle Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus
Focal Length 24mm 55mm 35mm 17-70mm 24mm -
Max Aperture f/1.4 f/1.4 f/1.7 f/2.8 f/1.8 f/1.4
Mount Four Thirds Nikon Z Fujifilm X Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M Canon RF Fujifilm X
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false false true
Weight (g) 953 281 400 544 272 320
AF Type - STM STM Autofocus Autofocus STM
Lens Type - - - Wide-Angle Zoom Wide-Angle -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilityStabilization
Samyang 24mm f/1.4 ED AS UMC Wide-Angle 46.487.21870.28488.137.537.9
Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare 95.681.881.189.167.588.137.587.8
Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare 95.673.663.493.27480.537.587.8
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare 46.459.264.377.490.854.692.587.8
Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare 46.481.887.68182.575.837.599.9
Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Standard Prime Compare 95.681.888.885.334.688.137.587.8

Verdict

Skip it. This lens is a physical mismatch for the Micro Four Thirds system. Its good optics are completely undermined by its enormous size, lack of stabilization, and mediocre autofocus. There are better, more purpose-built lenses for your camera that won't feel like you're carrying a brick.