MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

MSI
96 Overall Score
vs
BenQ SW321C 32" Black 2020

BenQ SW321C 32" Black 2020

BenQ
64 Overall Score

Scores

Professional
MSI
90
BenQ
77
Gaming
MSI
87
BenQ
49
Office
MSI
87
BenQ
67
Creative
MSI
87
BenQ
74
Entertainment
MSI
78
BenQ
55
Portable
MSI
14
BenQ
10

Specifications

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"BenQ SW321C 32"
Display
Size27"32"
Resolution3840 x 21603840 x 2160
Panel TypeOLEDIPS
Aspect Ratio16:916:9
Curved
Performance
Refresh Rate240 Hz60 Hz
Response Time0.029999999329447746 ms5 ms
Adaptive SyncG-Sync Compatible
Color & HDR
Brightness450 nits250 nits
Color Gamut98% Adobe RGB, 99% DCI-P3, 138% sRGB99% AdobeRGB, 95% P3, 100% sRGB
Color Depth10-bit10 bit
HDRDisplayHDR True Black 400HDR10
HDR SupportHDRHDR10
Connectivity
HDMI Ports22
DisplayPort11
USB-C11
Speakers
Headphone Jack
Ergonomics
Height Adjustable
Tilt
Swivel
Pivot
VESA Mount100x100100x100
Features
Webcam
Touchscreen
PIP/PBP
Power170W
Weight8.10 kg11.80 kg

Pros & Cons

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025

  • Strong performance (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong display (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong color (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile

BenQ SW321C 32" Black 2020

  • Strong display (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong ergonomic (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong feature (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Below average social proof (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average performance (22th percentile)

Pricing

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025 is CA$1,440 cheaper (2.1x less).

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 20250.076score per dollar
vs
BenQ SW321C 32" Black 20200.024score per dollar

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Black 2025 offers 3.2x better value for money

Verdict

Winner: MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27"

Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 8 of 28 specs.

MSI MPG 272URX QD-OLED 27" Better at:

GamingOfficeCreativePortableProfessionalEntertainment

Also Consider