Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Overall Score
vs
Beyerdynamic AMIRON 200
Beyerdynamic
51 Overall Score
Scores
Calls
Travel
Budget
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Specifications
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Beyerdynamic AMIRON 200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | open-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | Dual Ear True Wireless with Ear Clip/Hook |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.08 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | Dynamic | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | AAC, SBC |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | Beyerdynamic AMIRON 200 True Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds w/Ear Hooks. Running, Biking, Sport, Fitness Open Headphones with 36Hrs Playtime. IP54 Weather Resistant Earphones, Lightweight, Mic. (Black) | |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | HFP, A2DP, AVRCP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | USB-C |
| Range | 10 m | 15 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 11 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | 5 Minutes for 1.5 Hours |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | 25 hrs |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | — | 70 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | 2 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Beyerdynamic APP |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | IP54 |
Pros & Cons
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
Beyerdynamic AMIRON 200
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong mic (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong sound (74th percentile)
- Below average social proof (4th percentile)4th %ile
- Below average build (33th percentile)
Pricing
Technics EAH-AZ1000.294score per dollar
vs
Beyerdynamic AMIRON 2000.187score per dollar
Technics EAH-AZ100 offers 1.6x better value for money
Verdict
Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 38 specs.
