wo-we P8 2025

wo-we P8 2025

wo-we
61 Overall Score
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
94 Overall Score

Scores

Gaming
wo-we
11
HP
90
Business
wo-we
54
HP
86
Developer
wo-we
56
HP
86
Creator
wo-we
22
HP
86
Workstation
wo-we
50
HP
85
Home Office
wo-we
62
HP
84
Ai Llm
wo-we
23
HP
66
Compact
wo-we
53
HP
30

Specifications

wo-we P8HP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 5 7640HSAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
22,875
31,207
Cores68
Frequency4.3 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPUAMD Radeon 760MNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark ScoreNo data
28,796
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeSharedGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU850W
Weight0.58 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports38
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI 2.01 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort 1.43 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6EWi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.2Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetRJ45 LAN x2Gigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Pros & Cons

wo-we P8 2025

  • Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong ram (82th percentile)82th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (76th percentile)
  • Strong storage (72th percentile)
  • Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average reliability (12th percentile)12th %ile

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile

Pricing

wo-we P8 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

No current pricing available

Verdict

Winner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 94 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.

wo-we P8 Better at:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Better at:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation

Also Consider