Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Nextbase
19 Overall Score
vs
Kodak Charmera Charmera

Kodak Charmera Charmera

Kodak
29 Overall Score

Scores

Sports Wildlife
Nextbase
15
Kodak
29
Beginner
Nextbase
17
Kodak
29
Streaming
Nextbase
9
Kodak
18
Youtube
Nextbase
12
Kodak
17
Wedding Events
Nextbase
13
Kodak
17
Travel
Nextbase
12
Kodak
16
Video
Nextbase
14
Kodak
16
Photography
Nextbase
15
Kodak
15
Product Photography
Nextbase
14
Kodak
15
Vlogging
Nextbase
7
Kodak
10

Specifications

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera BackKodak Charmera Charmera
Sensor
TypeCMOS
Size1/2.3-inch
Megapixels1.600000023841858 MP
ISO Range100
Shooting
Burst (Mechanical)30 fps
Electronic Shutter
Video
Max Resolution1080p
1080p FPS30 fps
CodecAVI
Display & EVF
Touchscreen
Connectivity
USBUSB-C

Pros & Cons

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

  • Below average connectivity (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average social proof (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average sensor (26th percentile)

Kodak Charmera Charmera

  • Strong burst (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average sensor (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average video (21th percentile)
  • Below average display (26th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (32th percentile)

Pricing

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back is CA$144 cheaper (1.8x less).

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back0.106score per dollar
vs
Kodak Charmera Charmera0.090score per dollar

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back offers 1.2x better value for money

Nextbase NBIQRWC iQ Rear WIndow Camera Back

Kodak Charmera Charmera

Verdict

Winner: Kodak Charmera Charmera

Scores 29 overall, wins 7 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 11 specs.

Kodak Charmera Charmera Better at:

TravelYoutubeBeginnerVloggingStreamingWedding EventsSports Wildlife

Also Consider