Minolta MNS10 Blue
Minolta
32 Overall Score
vs
Fujifilm X-S X-S20 Black 2023
Fujifilm
83 Overall Score
Scores
Product Photography
Streaming
Youtube
Video
Vlogging
Beginner
Photography
Wedding Events
Travel
Sports Wildlife
Specifications
| Minolta MNS10 | Fujifilm X-S X-S20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | X-Trans CMOS 4 |
| Size | — | aps-c |
| Megapixels | 48 MP★ | 26.100000381469727 MP |
| ISO Range | 100★ | 160 |
| Processor | — | X-Processor 5 |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | No data | |
| AF Type | — | Single AF/ Continuous AF/ MF |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 20 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 20 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | — | 1/32000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 6K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 30 fps | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | MOV | H.264 ALL-Intra/H.264 Long GOP/H.265/H.265 Long GOP/MOV/MP4/MPEG-4 AVC 4:2:2/4:2:0 8/10-Bit |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.9" | 3"★ |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✓★ |
| EVF Resolution | — | 2.4M dots★ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✗ |
| Weight | — | 0.49 kg★ |
| Battery Life | — | 750 shots★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✓★ |
| USB | USB-C | USB-C |
| HDMI | — | HDMI type D |
| Hot Shoe | — | ✓★ |
Pros & Cons
Minolta MNS10 Blue
- Strong sensor (65th percentile)
- Below average display (24th percentile)
- Below average burst (27th percentile)
- Below average stabilization (30th percentile)
- Below average af (33th percentile)
Fujifilm X-S X-S20 Black 2023
- Strong display (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong stabilization (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Below average build (22th percentile)
Pricing
Minolta MNS10 Blue
No current pricing available
Fujifilm X-S X-S20 Black 2023
Verdict
Winner: Fujifilm X-S X-S20
Scores 83 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 22 of 33 specs.
