Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus Review

The Laowa 105mm f/2 scores in the 72nd percentile for bokeh quality, but it's a fully manual lens built for a specific creative niche. Here's who should buy it, and who will regret it.

Focal Length 105mm
Max Aperture f/2
Mount Nikon F
Stabilization No
Weather Sealed No
Weight 744 g
Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus lens
43.2 Gesamtbewertung

The 30-Second Version

The Laowa 105mm f/2 is a bokeh specialist, scoring in the 72nd percentile for background blur quality. It's a fully manual lens that trades autofocus and versatility for unique apodization control. Only buy this if 'creamy bokeh' is your top priority and you don't mind manually focusing every shot.

Overview

The Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus is a lens that makes a single, very specific promise: it's built to give you control over your bokeh like almost nothing else. With its unique apodization element and dual diaphragms, it lands in the 72nd percentile for bokeh quality in our database. That's its whole personality. The trade-off is that it's a fully manual lens, with autofocus performance sitting at the 46th percentile, and it's built for a specific creative niche, not for general use.

You get a true f/2 aperture for depth of field, but the APD element cuts light transmission to a T3.2. So you have the shallow focus of an f/2 lens, but the light gathering of something slower. It's a 105mm prime for Nikon F mount, weighing in at a solid 744g. This isn't a lens you buy for its versatility score, which is down at the 38th percentile. You buy it because you want to paint with blur.

Performance

Let's talk about what this lens actually does well. Its optical performance and bokeh quality both rank in the 72nd percentile. That's significantly above average, and it's all down to that apodization (APD) element. This element acts like a graduated filter, softening the edges of the out-of-focus highlights to create that creamy, dreamy look that's so hard to achieve. The dual diaphragm system—with both 8 and 14-blade apertures—gives you direct control over the shape and character of the bokeh balls. It's a toolkit for background rendering. Just don't expect it to be a macro workhorse; its 1:6.25 max magnification and 900mm minimum focus distance put its macro capabilities in the 43rd percentile.

Performance Percentiles

AF 46.4
Bokeh 72.4
Build 52.3
Macro 48.7
Optical 72
Aperture 68.6
Versatility 37.5
Social Proof 4.8
Stabilization 37.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Strong bokeh (72th percentile) 72th
  • Strong optical (72th percentile) 72th
  • Strong aperture (69th percentile) 69th

Cons

  • Below average social proof (5th percentile) 5th

The Word on the Street

0.0/5 (4 reviews)
👍 Users who understand its niche praise the lens for producing uniquely beautiful, soft-focus portraits with exceptional background rendering.
🤔 There's confusion around its compatibility and data communication, with some noting it works with focus aids like peaking but doesn't transmit EXIF data to the camera.
👎 A common point of friction is the fully manual operation, which is a deal-breaker for photographers accustomed to or requiring autofocus.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Focal Length Min 105
Focal Length Max 105
Elements 11
Groups 8

Aperture

Max Aperture f/2
Min Aperture f/22
Diaphragm Blades 8

Build

Mount Nikon F
Format Full-Frame
Weight 0.7 kg / 1.6 lbs
Filter Thread 67

AF & Stabilization

Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 900
Max Magnification 1:6.25

Value & Pricing

At around $479, the value proposition is entirely about the niche. You're not paying for autofocus, stabilization, or a lightweight design. You're paying for that apodization element and the dual-diaphragm system. For a photographer who specifically wants that silky-smooth bokeh look and doesn't mind manual everything, it could be a bargain. For anyone else, it's an expensive paperweight. There aren't many direct competitors with APD elements, which is why Laowa can occupy this space at this price.

657 CA$

vs Competition

This lens doesn't really compete with the Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 or the Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8. Those are autofocus, versatile zooms or wide-aperture primes for general use. The Laowa 105mm f/2 is the opposite. A closer, though still imperfect, comparison might be to a classic manual portrait lens like a Samyang 85mm f/1.4. You'd get a faster aperture (true f/1.4) and likely better low-light performance for less money, but you wouldn't get the engineered bokeh control of the APD element. The Laowa trades pure speed and convenience for a specific, artistic rendering tool. It's a specialist, not a generalist.

Spec Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus Meike Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF Viltrox Air VILTROX 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 Air AF Lens for Fuji X Tamron Di III Tamron 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD Lens for Sony Canon RF Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Lens Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus
Focal Length 105mm 55mm 35mm 17-70mm 24mm -
Max Aperture f/2 f/1.4 f/1.7 f/2.8 f/1.8 f/1.4
Mount Nikon F Nikon Z Fujifilm X Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-Mount, Sony E-M Canon RF Fujifilm X
Stabilization false true true true true true
Weather Sealed false false false false false true
Weight (g) 744 281 400 544 272 320
AF Type - STM STM Autofocus Autofocus STM
Lens Type - - - Wide-Angle Zoom Wide-Angle -
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfBokehBuildMacroOpticalApertureVersatilitySocial ProofStabilization
Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus 46.472.452.348.77268.637.54.837.9
Meike 55mm F1.4 Standard Aperture APS-C Frame AF STM Compare 95.681.881.189.167.588.137.589.987.8
Viltrox Air 35mm F1.7 f/1.7 AF Compare 95.673.663.493.27480.537.595.187.8
Tamron Di III 17-70mm f/2.8 -A VC RXD Compare 46.459.264.377.490.854.692.595.187.8
Canon RF 24mm f/1.8 Macro IS STM Compare 46.481.887.68182.575.837.59899.9
Fujifilm VILTROX 56mm F1.4 STM APS-C Frame Auto Focus Standard Prime Compare 95.681.888.885.334.688.137.586.787.8

Common Questions

Q: Is this an autofocus lens?

No, it's fully manual focus. Its autofocus capability percentile is 46, meaning it has no autofocus system at all. You must focus using the lens ring and your camera's focus aids like peaking or magnification.

Q: Why does it say f/2 but T3.2?

The f/2 refers to the aperture's physical size, which gives you the shallow depth of field of an f/2 lens. The T3.2 (T-stop) is the actual light transmission. The built-in apodization element acts like a filter, reducing the light that reaches the sensor, so for exposure settings, you treat it like a T3.2 lens.

Q: Will it work with my camera's in-body stabilization (IBIS)?

Maybe, but not automatically. As a fully manual lens with no electronic contacts, it won't transmit focal length data. You'll likely need to manually input the 105mm focal length into your camera's IBIS menu for the stabilization to work correctly, as mentioned in user experiences.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you need autofocus, shoot fast-moving subjects, or value a lightweight, versatile kit. Its versatility score is in the 38th percentile for a reason. Travel photographers (its weakest area at 24.8/100), event shooters, or anyone who isn't deeply interested in the technical craft of bokeh manipulation will find it frustrating and limiting. You're paying a premium for a feature you might never fully utilize.

Verdict

We can only recommend the Laowa 105mm f/2 Smooth Trans Focus to a very specific photographer: someone who shoots primarily controlled portraits or still life, values unique bokeh over all else, and is completely comfortable with manual focus and aperture control. Its data backs this up—strong scores in bokeh and optics, weak scores everywhere related to convenience. If your work lives in that 72nd-percentile bokeh niche, it's a fascinating tool. For 95% of shooters, a standard autofocus 85mm or 105mm lens will be a far more practical and satisfying choice.