Sigma MC-11
Sigma
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Panasonic
93 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Travel
Video Cinema
Budget
Landscape
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Portrait
Street
Spezifikationen
| Sigma MC-11 | Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | — | macro |
| Focal Length Min | — | 28 mm |
| Focal Length Max | — | 200 mm |
| Elements | — | 17 |
| Groups | — | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | — | 1★ |
| ED Elements | — | 4★ |
| Coating | — | Fluorine coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/4 |
| Min Aperture | — | 4-7.1 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon EF | L-Mount |
| Format | — | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.41 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | — | 67 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | Autofocus |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 6.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | — | 140 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | — | 0.5x★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sigma MC-11
- Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
- Strong aperture (72th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (70th percentile)
- Below average macro (8th percentile)8th %ile
- Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average optical (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average build (27th percentile)
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong optical (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
Preise
Sigma MC-110.139Score pro Dollar
vs
Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm0.059Score pro Dollar
Sigma MC-11 bietet 2.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Panasonic LUMIX S S-R28200 28-200mm
Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.
