Sigma DN 35S963

Sigma DN 35S963

Sigma
56 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony G SEL1655G

Sony G SEL1655G

Sony
92 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Sigma
54
Sony
99
Professional
Sigma
53
Sony
93
Portrait
Sigma
66
Sony
91
Video Cinema
Sigma
57
Sony
88
Street
Sigma
64
Sony
87
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
46
Sony
87
Landscape
Sigma
33
Sony
82
Travel
Sigma
42
Sony
80
Macro
Sigma
47
Sony
76

Spezifikationen

Sigma DN 35S963Sony G SEL1655G
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min60 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm55 mm
Elements17
Groups12
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements3
CoatingSLDNano AR Coating and Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Min Aperture2.82.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsSony E
Formatmicro-four-thirdsAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.19 kg0.49 kg
Filter Thread46 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typelinear auto focus motorXD Linear Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance500 mm330 mm
Max Magnification1:7.21:5

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma DN 35S963

  • Strong build (83th percentile)83th %ile
  • Strong aperture (79th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Sony G SEL1655G

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong versatility (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average stabilization (35th percentile)

Preise

Sigma DN 35S963

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony G SEL1655G

Scores 92 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sony G SEL1655G Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen