Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm
Canon
56 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Street
Budget
Portrait
Wildlife Sports
Video Cinema
Professional
Macro
Travel
Landscape
Spezifikationen
| Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm | Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | prime |
| Focal Length Min | 56 mm | 32 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 56 mm | 65 mm |
| Elements | 11 | — |
| Groups | 9 | — |
| ED Elements | 4★ | — |
| Coating | HD nano-coating | — |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | 16★ | T3.2 |
| Min Aperture | 1.7 | T3.2 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Sony E | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C | full-frame★ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg★ | 0.29 kg |
| Filter Thread | 52 mm | 55 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM★ | — |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 550 mm | 460 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:9.09★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong build (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Strong optical (69th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm
- Strong aperture (79th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (77th percentile)
- Strong versatility (74th percentile)
- Strong build (73th percentile)
- Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
Preise
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm0.362Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon Beetle Blazar 32mm0.068Score pro Dollar
Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm bietet 5.3x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 56/1.7 E 56mm
Scores 71 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 19 specs.
