Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Viltrox
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon Retropia 32mm

Canon Retropia 32mm

Canon
42 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Street
Viltrox
74
Canon
48
Budget
Viltrox
68
Canon
43
Video Cinema
Viltrox
66
Canon
50
Macro
Viltrox
65
Canon
35
Portrait
Viltrox
65
Canon
46
Wildlife Sports
Viltrox
65
Canon
37
Professional
Viltrox
60
Canon
45
Travel
Viltrox
59
Canon
46
Landscape
Viltrox
50
Canon
33

Spezifikationen

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mmCanon Retropia 32mm
Optics
Typeprimeprime
Focal Length Min35 mm32 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm32 mm
Elements11
Groups9
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
Coatingnano multi-layer coating
Aperture
Max Aperture1611
Min Aperture1.711
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
FormatAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.17 kg0.05 kg
Filter Thread52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTMmanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance330 mm1.50 m
Max Magnification1:7.7

Vor- & Nachteile

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

  • Strong social proof (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Canon Retropia 32mm

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (81th percentile)81th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average macro (31th percentile)

Preise

Canon Retropia 32mm is 139 CA$ cheaper (3.5x less).

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm0.379Score pro Dollar
vs
Canon Retropia 32mm0.757Score pro Dollar

Canon Retropia 32mm bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Canon Retropia 32mm

Fazit

Gewinner: Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm

Scores 74 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Viltrox AF AF 35/1.7 Z 35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen