Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M
Audio-Technica
31 Gesamtbewertung
vs
JBL Endurance Race Endurance Race 2
JBL
88 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Fitness
Budget
Travel
Calls
Gaming
Commute
Music
Spezifikationen
| Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M | JBL Endurance Race Endurance Race 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | ear-tip | Dual Ear True Wireless with Ear Clip/Hook |
| Ear Tips | — | Large, Medium, Small |
| Weight | 0.02 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | Dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 6.800000190734863 mm★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 20 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 20 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 104 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 94 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | — |
| Codecs | — | JBL Endurance Race 2 - Waterproof (IP68) sports true wireless earbuds with 4 mics for crisp, clear calls, JBL Pure Bass sound, 48Hrs of Playback, plus speed charging & Active Noise Cancelling (Purple) |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Smart Ambient |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 12 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 10 Minutes for 4 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 36 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | ✗ | ✗ |
| Capacity | — | 70 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 4★ |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✓★ |
| App | — | JBL Headphones |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IP68 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average mic (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
- Below average anc (30th percentile)
JBL Endurance Race Endurance Race 2
- Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
Preise
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M1.541Score pro Dollar
vs
JBL Endurance Race Endurance Race 21.079Score pro Dollar
Audio-Technica ATH-EQ300M bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: JBL Endurance Race Endurance Race 2
Scores 88 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 37 specs.
