Sennheiser CX CX 400-II
Sennheiser
26 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S
Technics
93 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Music
Calls
Commute
Budget
Travel
Gaming
Fitness
Spezifikationen
| Sennheiser CX CX 400-II | Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | S, M, L | XS, S, M, L, XL |
| Weight | 0.05 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | — | LDAC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | — | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | hybrid |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | — | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 7 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 1.1 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 24 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Capacity | — | 85 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | — | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 8★ |
| NC Mic | — | ✓★ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Alexa, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Technics Audio Connect |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Sennheiser CX CX 400-II
- Strong comfort (71th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average mic (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average sound (28th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S
- Strong mic (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong comfort (93th percentile)93th %ile
- Strong anc (92th percentile)92th %ile
Preise
Sennheiser CX CX 400-II0.398Score pro Dollar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S0.343Score pro Dollar
Sennheiser CX CX 400-II bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ80 EAH-AZ80-S
Scores 93 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 23 of 36 specs.
