HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF Black/Silver

HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF Black/Silver

HP
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
MSI Codex Z2 C8NVL-475US Gaming

MSI Codex Z2 C8NVL-475US Gaming

MSI
82 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Home Office
HP
69
MSI
83
Gaming
HP
23
MSI
80
Business
HP
74
MSI
78
Workstation
HP
68
MSI
78
Developer
HP
64
MSI
77
Creator
HP
33
MSI
75
Compact
HP
69
MSI
27

Spezifikationen

HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFFMSI Codex Z2 C8NVL-475US Gaming
Processor
CPU64 bit 6-Core ProcessorAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core ScoreKeine Daten
31,207
Cores61
Frequency3.0 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache9 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPUIntel UHD Graphics 6305060
GPU Benchmark ScoreKeine Daten
20,798
Typeintegrateddiscrete
VRAM48 GB8 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6GDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM32 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 1512 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeSSDSSD
Build
Form FactorsffTower
PSU650W
Weight12.97 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports1
USB Ports108
HDMI1x HDMI
DisplayPort2 Display Port8x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6E
BluetoothYes
EthernetFast Ethernet0 Ethernet ports
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF Black/Silver

  • Strong gpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong port (77th percentile)
  • Strong reliability (72th percentile)
  • Below average storage (29th percentile)

MSI Codex Z2 C8NVL-475US Gaming

  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong port (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (79th percentile)
  • Strong cpu (70th percentile)

Preise

HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF Black/Silver

MSI Codex Z2 C8NVL-475US Gaming

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: MSI Codex Z2 C8NVL-475US Gaming

Scores 82 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 11 of 25 specs.

HP ProDesk 600 G4 SFF Besser bei:

Compact

MSI Codex Z2 C8NVL-475US Gaming Besser bei:

GamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation