Kolari Vision Canon EOS R5 R5
Kolari Vision
71 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2
Fujifilm
89 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Product Photography
Photography
Video
Sports Wildlife
Youtube
Wedding Events
Beginner
Streaming
Vlogging
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Kolari Vision Canon EOS R5 R5 | Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | X-Trans CMOS |
| Size | full-frame | aps-c |
| Megapixels | 45 MP★ | 40 MP |
| ISO Range | 100★ | 125 |
| Processor | — | X-Processor 5 |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | Phase Detection: 1053 | Single AF/ Continuous AF/ MF |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Animal AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | — | ✓★ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 20 fps★ | 15 fps |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 20 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | 1/8000 | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 8K | 8K |
| 4K FPS | 120 fps★ | 60 fps |
| 1080p FPS | 60 fps | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | ✓ | ✓ |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| RAW Video | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codec | H.264, H.265 | ProRes Raw, Blackmagic Raw via HDMI |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3.2"★ | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✓ | ✓ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | 5.8M dots | 5.8M dots |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.65 kg | 0.58 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓ | ✓ |
| USB | USB-C 3.1/3.2 Gen 2 | USB-C |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | HDMI Type A |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kolari Vision Canon EOS R5 R5
- Strong video (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong evf (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong af (91th percentile)91th %ile
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2
- Strong sensor (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong evf (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong video (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
Preise
Kolari Vision Canon EOS R5 R50.008Score pro Dollar
vs
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H20.028Score pro Dollar
Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2 bietet 3.5x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Fujifilm X-H2 X-H2
Scores 89 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 7 of 32 specs.
