Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue
Kodak
43 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Adesso Orbit D200
Adesso
20 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Beginner
Streaming
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Video
Youtube
Product Photography
Vlogging
Photography
Spezifikationen
| Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 | Adesso Orbit D200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | — |
| Megapixels | 16 MP★ | — |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 25★ | — |
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 6 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/2000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 1080p FPS | 30 fps | 30 fps |
| 10-bit | ✗ | — |
| RAW Video | ✗ | — |
| Codec | H.264/MOV | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.7"★ | 1.5" |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | — |
| Battery Life | 2000 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓★ | — |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | — |
| USB | USB 2.0 micro-B★ | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue
- Strong battery (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (82th percentile)82th %ile
- Strong stabilization (72th percentile)
- Strong build (70th percentile)
- Below average af (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average sensor (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average display (26th percentile)
Adesso Orbit D200
- Below average connectivity (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average sensor (26th percentile)
Preise
Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Electric Blue0.149Score pro Dollar
vs
Adesso Orbit D2000.202Score pro Dollar
Adesso Orbit D200 bietet 1.4x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2
Scores 43 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 11 of 25 specs.
