Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue
Kodak
38 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra
Reolink
29 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Travel
Beginner
Video
Wedding Events
Streaming
Sports Wildlife
Youtube
Photography
Product Photography
Vlogging
Spezifikationen
| Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 | Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | BSI-CMOS | — |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | — |
| Megapixels | 16 MP★ | 8 MP |
| ISO Range | 100★ | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | 25★ | — |
| Eye AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓ | ✓ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 6 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/2000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✗ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 1080p FPS | 30 fps★ | — |
| 10-bit | ✗ | — |
| RAW Video | ✗ | — |
| Codec | H.264/MOV | — |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 2.7"★ | — |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | — |
| Articulating | ✗ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.18 kg★ | 1.38 kg |
| Battery Life | 2000 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-2.0 | USB Type-A to USB Type-C |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue
- Strong battery (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (73th percentile)
- Strong build (70th percentile)
- Below average af (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average sensor (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average video (21th percentile)
- Below average display (26th percentile)
Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra
- Strong social proof (73th percentile)
- Below average sensor (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average display (26th percentile)
- Below average burst (29th percentile)
Preise
Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2 Blue0.132Score pro Dollar
vs
Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra0.163Score pro Dollar
Reolink Argus Argus PT Ultra bietet 1.2x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Kodak PIXPRO WPZ2
Scores 38 overall, wins 6 of 10 usage categories and 9 of 25 specs.
