Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black
Kodak
14 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony FX FX3A Black
Sony
70 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Youtube
Beginner
Streaming
Video
Vlogging
Sports Wildlife
Wedding Events
Product Photography
Photography
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 | Sony FX FX3A | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | 1/2.3-inch | full-frame |
| Megapixels | 16.350000381469727 MP★ | 12.100000381469727 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 | 80★ |
| Processor | — | BIONZ XR |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | — | Phase Detection: 759 |
| Eye AF | — | ✓★ |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | — | 10 fps★ |
| Burst (Electronic) | — | 120 fps★ |
| Max Shutter | 1/2000 | 1/8000 |
| Electronic Shutter | — | ✓★ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 1080p | 4K★ |
| 4K FPS | — | 120 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 30 fps | 240 fps★ |
| 10-bit | — | ✓★ |
| Log Profile | — | ✓★ |
| RAW Video | — | ✓★ |
| Codec | H.264/MOV | XAVC S, XAVC S-I, XAVC HS |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Build | ||
| Weight | 0.34 kg★ | 0.64 kg |
| Battery Life | 280 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✓★ |
| USB | Micro-USB (USB 2.0) | USB-C 3.2 Gen 2★ |
| HDMI | Micro HDMI★ | HDMI |
| Hot Shoe | ✗ | ✓★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black
- Below average af (2th percentile)2th %ile
- Below average battery (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average sensor (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average build (15th percentile)15th %ile
Sony FX FX3A Black
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong burst (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong connectivity (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong af (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average sensor (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average evf (34th percentile)
Preise
Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black0.043Score pro Dollar
vs
Sony FX FX3A Black0.014Score pro Dollar
Kodak PIXPRO AZ255 Black bietet 3.1x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis
Fazit
Gewinner: Sony FX FX3A
Scores 70 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 18 of 30 specs.
