Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens + Filter Kit + Accessory kit Review

The Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM scores a dismal 16.3/100 in our tests. It's a cheap, tiny pancake lens, but its slow aperture and poor video performance make it hard to recommend.

IBIS No
Weather Sealed No
Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens + Filter Kit + Accessory kit camera
15.6 Genel Puan

The 30-Second Version

With an overall score of 16.3/100, this is one of the lowest-ranked lenses in our database. It's a cheap, ultra-slim pancake lens for Canon APS-C DSLRs, but its slow f/2.8 aperture, mediocre autofocus, and complete lack of stabilization make it a poor choice for anything beyond basic daylight snapshots. Avoid for video.

Overview

At $180, the Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM is one of the most affordable prime lenses you can slap on an APS-C Canon DSLR. That price gets you a 38mm equivalent field of view, which is a classic 'normal' perspective, and a surprisingly slim 'pancake' design that makes your camera a lot more pocketable. But this is a lens that's been around for a while, and our data shows it's a solid, middle-of-the-pack performer that hasn't kept up with the mirrorless era. Its overall score of 16.3 out of 100 puts it near the bottom of our rankings, and it's particularly weak for video and vlogging, where it scores a dismal 6.4.

Performance

Let's be clear: this isn't a lens you buy for cutting-edge performance. Its autofocus system lands in the 44th percentile, which means it's about average for its class but can feel a bit slow and noisy compared to modern STM or USM motors. The f/2.8 aperture is fine for general use, but it's not particularly fast, limiting its low-light capability and background blur compared to an f/1.8 or f/1.4 prime. The lack of any image stabilization (a 40th percentile ranking) means you're relying entirely on your camera body's IBIS, if it has it. For still photography in good light, it's perfectly capable, but it starts to show its age the moment you ask more of it.

Performance Percentiles

AF 42.6
EVF 42.8
Build 36.5
Burst 36.4
Video 28.7
Sensor 30
Battery 48.2
Display 35.4
Connectivity 33.4
Stabilization 40.8

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Extremely affordable at $180, making it one of the cheapest ways to try a prime lens.
  • Pancake design is incredibly slim and light, drastically reducing your kit's bulk.
  • 38mm equivalent focal length is versatile for everyday shooting, street photography, and environmental portraits.
  • STM motor provides decently quiet autofocus for its class, though it's not the fastest.
  • Comes with a filter kit, adding a little extra value to the purchase.

Cons

  • Overall performance score of 16.3/100 is one of the worst we've seen in our database. 29th
  • A dismal 6.4/100 score for vlogging due to the focal length, slowish AF, and lack of stabilization. 30th
  • Build quality feels plasticky and is not weather-sealed, ranking in the 36th percentile. 33th
  • f/2.8 maximum aperture is underwhelming for low light and subject isolation compared to faster primes.
  • Designed for EF-S DSLR mounts, so it's not a future-proof choice if you're moving to Canon's RF mirrorless system.

Specifications

Full Specifications

Value & Pricing

The value proposition here is simple: it's cheap. At $180, you're getting a functional, compact prime lens that can teach you the benefits of a fixed focal length without breaking the bank. The included filter kit is a nice bonus. However, that low price comes with significant compromises in performance, build, and future compatibility. You're buying a lens that's firmly in the 'last generation' category. If your budget is absolutely locked at $200, it's an option. But if you can stretch a little further, there are much better-performing lenses, even used ones, that offer faster apertures and better build quality.

$180

vs Competition

Stacked against its peers, the EF-S 24mm f/2.8 looks dated. A used Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 STM, while not a pancake, offers a much faster aperture for similar money, giving you far better low-light performance and background blur on an APS-C body (it becomes an 80mm equivalent, though). Compared to modern mirrorless kit lenses like the Canon RF-S 18-45mm, you're trading zoom versatility for a slightly sharper prime experience and a more compact form factor, but the modern kit lens will have faster, quieter autofocus and often better video features. The Nikon Z 28mm f/2.8 SE for their Z system is a more modern pancake counterpart, but it's for a completely different mount and typically costs more.

Spec Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens + Filter Kit + Accessory kit Sony ZV Sony ZV-E10 Mirrorless Camera (Black) Panasonic Lumix G Panasonic DMCG7/B, 14-42mm F/3.5-5.6 Ii Mega OIS, Olympus E-M Olympus - OM-D E-M10 Mark IV Mirrorless Digital Fujifilm X-T Fujifilm - X-T30 III Mirrorless Camera (Body Only) Nikon Z Nikon Z30 Mirrorless Camera with 16-50mm Lens
Type - Mirrorless Mirrorless Mirrorless Mirrorless Mirrorless
Sensor - 24.2MP APS-C 16MP Four Thirds 21.8MP Four Thirds 26.1MP APS-C 20.9MP APS-C
AF Points - 425 - 121 425 209
Burst FPS - 11 6 15 20 11
Video - 4K 4K 4K 6K @60fps 4K
IBIS false false true true false false
Weather Sealed false false true false false false
Weight (g) - 343 499 1456 329 349
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AfEvfBuildBurstVideoSensorBatteryDisplayConnectivityStabilization
Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens + Filter Kit + Accessory kit 42.642.836.536.428.73048.235.433.440.8
Sony ZV E10 Compare 96.287.27.679.89583.697.695.796.140.8
Panasonic Lumix G Dmcg7/b Compare 89.442.883.172.374.76796.676.386.190
Olympus E-M OM-D 10 Mark IV Mirrorless Compare 92.891.96985.366.17148.287.381.990
Fujifilm X-T 30 III Compare 96.787.87.387.297.788.396.187.390.340.8
Nikon Z 30 Compare 93.988.57.979.89579.396.495.790.340.8

Common Questions

Q: Is this lens good for low-light photography?

Not really. The f/2.8 aperture is about average, ranking in the middle of the pack. You'll get better results from a prime with an f/1.8 or faster aperture, which gathers over twice as much light.

Q: Can I use this lens on a Canon EOS R mirrorless camera?

Yes, but you'll need a Canon EF to RF mount adapter, which adds cost and bulk. More importantly, its optical and autofocus performance (44th percentile) won't magically improve, and you'll be adapting an older DSLR lens to a modern mirrorless body.

Q: Is this a good lens for beginners?

It's a mixed bag. Its low price and simple prime focal length are great for learning composition. However, its low overall score and specific weaknesses (like poor video performance) mean a beginner might outgrow its limitations quickly. A standard kit zoom might be a more versatile first lens.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you shoot video or vlog—its 6.4/100 score for vlogging is a deal-breaker. Also avoid it if you own a Canon mirrorless camera (EOS R, RP, R10, etc.); adapting this mediocre DSLR lens makes little sense when there are better native RF options. Photographers who need weather sealing, fast autofocus, or a bright aperture for low light should look elsewhere. This lens is for a niche, budget-conscious DSLR user only.

Verdict

We can only recommend the Canon EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM to a very specific user: someone with an older Canon APS-C DSLR who wants the absolute smallest, cheapest prime lens possible for casual stills photography. Its terrible scores for video and vlogging make it a non-starter for content creators. For everyone else, especially those considering a move to mirrorless, this lens is a dead end. Spend a bit more on a used faster prime or save for a native mirrorless lens; your future self will thank you.