Acer Nitro Acer Nitro 25" (24.5" Viewable) Full HD 1080P Review
The Acer Nitro KG251Q packs a 97th percentile performance score into a $130 monitor, offering a blazing 280Hz refresh rate for competitive gamers. Just don't expect stunning image quality from its 1080p VA panel.
The 30-Second Version
This monitor's performance lands in the 97th percentile, making it one of the fastest in our database for just $130. You get a blazing 280Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time, perfect for competitive gaming, but average display quality and modest 250-nit brightness. It's a speed specialist on a budget.
Overview
The Acer Nitro KG251Q Z1biip is a 280Hz speed demon in a 1080p package, and at $130, it's priced like a steal. Its performance score lands in the 97th percentile, which is a fancy way of saying it's one of the fastest monitors in our database. That 280Hz refresh rate and 1ms response time are the whole story here, built for one thing: competitive gaming where every frame counts.
You're getting a 24.5-inch VA panel with a 1920 x 1080 resolution. It's HDR10 ready and hits 250 nits of brightness. The feature set is solid for the price, sitting in the 84th percentile, and it includes AMD FreeSync Premium. Just know this is a pure performance play. The display and connectivity scores are in the 30th percentile range, so it's not winning any awards for picture quality or having a ton of ports.
Performance
This monitor's performance score is its party trick, sitting in the 97th percentile. That's driven almost entirely by its 280Hz refresh rate, which you'll need a DisplayPort cable to hit. Use HDMI and you're capped at a still-impressive 240Hz. The 1ms VRB response time backs that up, making motion clarity its strongest suit. In our gaming-specific scoring, it hits a 59.3 out of 100, which is very good for a budget monitor.
Where it takes a step back is in pure display quality. The color score is in the 76th percentile, which is decent, but it's working with a 72% NTSC color gamut and 250 nits of brightness. For fast-paced esports titles, that's more than enough. For watching movies or editing photos, you'll want to look elsewhere.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Strong performance (97th percentile) 97th
- Strong feature (84th percentile) 84th
- Strong ergonomic (75th percentile) 75th
- Strong color (71th percentile) 71th
Cons
- Below average compact (29th percentile) 29th
- Below average display (31th percentile) 31th
- Below average connectivity (33th percentile) 33th
Specifications
Full Specifications
Display
| Size | 24.5" |
| Resolution | 1920 (Full HD) |
| Panel Type | VA |
| Aspect Ratio | 16:9 |
Performance
| Refresh Rate | 280 Hz |
| Response Time | 1 |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium |
Color & HDR
| Brightness | 250 nits |
| HDR | HDR10 |
| HDR Support | HDR10 |
Connectivity
| Speakers | No |
Ergonomics
| Height Adjustable | No |
| Tilt | Yes |
| Swivel | No |
| Pivot | No |
| VESA Mount | 100x100 |
Features
| Weight | 3.4 kg / 7.5 lbs |
Value & Pricing
At $130, the value proposition here is incredibly straightforward. You are paying for raw speed, and you're getting a lot of it. The performance percentile crushes monitors twice its price. You're sacrificing panel quality, peak brightness, and some connectivity to hit that price point, but for a dedicated gaming secondary monitor or a budget esports rig, the trade-off makes perfect sense.
vs Competition
Compared to the high-end competitors like the 4K 240Hz MSI MPG or the QD-OLED ASUS ROG Swift, this Acer lives in a different universe. Those are premium, all-around performers. This Nitro is a specialist. It gives up resolution, HDR impact, and color volume to absolutely dominate in motion clarity and responsiveness for the money. Even against other 1080p high-refresh monitors, its 97th percentile performance score and sub-$150 price make it a standout. The Samsung Odyssey G9 and LG UltraGear 45 are in different size and resolution classes entirely, so they're not direct rivals.
| Spec | Acer Nitro Acer Nitro 25" (24.5" Viewable) Full HD 1080P | Samsung Odyssey Samsung - 57" Odyssey Neo G9 Dual 4K UHD Quantum | LG UltraGear LG UltraGear 45" WUHD DUAL MODE 4K 165Hz FHD 330Hz | ASUS ROG Swift ASUS Republic of Gamers Swift OLED PG27UCDM 26.5" | MSI MPG MSI 27 inch WQHD 2K 1440P 360Hz with AMD FreeSync | Dell UltraSharp Dell UltraSharp 27" 4K HDR 120 Hz Monitor (2-Pack) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 24.5 | 57 | 45 | 27 | 27 | 27 |
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 | 7680 x 2160 | 5120 x 2160 | 3840 x 2160 | 2560 x 1440 | 3840 x 2160 |
| Panel Type | VA | VA | OLED | OLED | OLED | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 280 | 240 | 165 | 240 | 360 | 120 |
| Response Time Ms | 1 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 5 |
| Adaptive Sync | FreeSync Premium | FreeSync Premium Pro | G-Sync Compatible | G-Sync Compatible | FreeSync Premium Pro | - |
| Hdr | HDR10 | HDR10+ | HDR10 | HDR400 | HDR400 | HDR |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
Common Questions
Q: Does this monitor support variable refresh rate for gaming?
Yes, it features AMD FreeSync Premium technology. This syncs the monitor's refresh rate with your AMD (or compatible NVIDIA) graphics card's frame rate to eliminate screen tearing and stuttering, which is crucial for taking full advantage of that 97th percentile performance score.
Q: What's the real difference between using DisplayPort and HDMI on this monitor?
You need to use DisplayPort to hit the full 280Hz refresh rate. If you connect via HDMI, the refresh rate is capped at 240Hz. Both are incredibly fast, but to unlock the monitor's top-tier, 97th percentile performance spec, DisplayPort is mandatory.
Q: Is the HDR on this monitor any good for games and movies?
It's HDR10 ready, but with a peak brightness of only 250 nits, don't expect a transformative HDR experience. The monitor's display quality score is in the 32nd percentile. The HDR support is nice to have, but this panel is really about raw speed, not cinematic contrast or brightness.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this if you care more about image quality than raw speed. Its display score is in the 32nd percentile, and the 250-nit brightness won't pop in a bright room. Content creators, photo editors, or anyone wanting a sharp 4K image for single-player games should look at monitors with higher display and color percentile rankings, even if it means a lower refresh rate.
Verdict
If your priority is max frames per dollar for competitive gaming, this is an easy recommendation. The 97th percentile performance score doesn't lie. It's fast, it's smooth, and it has FreeSync Premium. Just go in with eyes open: the display quality is average, the brightness is modest, and it's a 1080p panel. For a secondary monitor focused on esports or a budget build where every dollar counts toward a better GPU, it's a fantastic, data-backed choice.