HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a 2025
HP
67 Score global
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab 11" A9+ Silver 2024
Samsung
38 Score global
Scores
Compact
Developer
Student
Business
Entertainment
Creator
Gaming
Spécifications
| HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a | Samsung Galaxy Tab 11" A9+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 340 | AMD Ryzen 3 1200★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Pas de données | |
| Cores | 6★ | 4 |
| Frequency | 3.4 GHz★ | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | AMD Radeon 840M | — |
| Type | integrated★ | — |
| VRAM Type | Shared | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 8 GB |
| RAM Generation | DDR5★ | — |
| Storage 1 | 512 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | NVMe SSD★ | — |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 11" |
| Resolution | 1920 px | 1920 px |
| Panel | IPS★ | — |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 300 nits★ | — |
| Color Gamut | 62.5% sRGB | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2★ | 0 |
| USB Ports | 2★ | 1 |
| Thunderbolt | Thunderbolt 4 | — |
| HDMI | HDMI 2.1 | — |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax)★ | 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac 2.4G+5GHz, VHT80 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.3★ | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| Ethernet | Gigabit Ethernet | — |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.40 kg | 0.48 kg★ |
| Battery | 56 Wh★ | — |
| OS | Windows 11 Pro | Android 14 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a 2025
- Strong port (92th percentile)92th %ile
- Strong ram (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong cpu (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong compact (77th percentile)
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average reliability (31th percentile)
Samsung Galaxy Tab 11" A9+ Silver 2024
- Strong compact (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong reliability (78th percentile)
- Below average cpu (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average storage (6th percentile)6th %ile
- Below average ram (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
Prix
HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a 2025
No current pricing available
Samsung Galaxy Tab 11" A9+ Silver 2024
Verdict
Gagnant: HP EliteBook 14" 6 G1a
Scores 67 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
