Samsung
Samsung
12 Puntuación general
vs
ASUS Zenbook Duo 14" UX8406CA-PS99T Inkwell Gray 2025
ASUS
85 Puntuación general
Puntuaciones
Entertainment
Student
Business
Compact
Developer
Creator
Gaming
Especificaciones
| Samsung | ASUS Zenbook Duo 14" UX8406CA-PS99T | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | — | Intel Core Ultra 9 285H★ |
| CPU Multi-Core Score | Sin datos | |
| Cores | — | 16★ |
| Frequency | — | 2.9 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | — | 24 MB★ |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU | — | Intel Arc★ |
| GPU Benchmark Score | Sin datos | |
| Type | — | integrated★ |
| VRAM | — | 16 GB★ |
| VRAM Type | — | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | — | 32 GB★ |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage 1 | — | 1 TB★ |
| Storage 1 Type | — | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | — | 14" |
| Resolution | — | 2880 px★ |
| Panel | — | OLED★ |
| Refresh Rate | 60 Hz | 120 Hz★ |
| Brightness | — | 500 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 100% DCI-P3 |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | — | 2★ |
| USB Ports | — | 1★ |
| Thunderbolt | — | Thunderbolt 4 |
| HDMI | 2 x HDMI | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 4 | Wi-Fi 7★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.4★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | — | 1.65 kg★ |
| Battery | — | 75 Wh★ |
| OS | — | Windows 11 Home |
Pros y Contras
Samsung
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong reliability (78th percentile)
- Below average storage (1th percentile)1th %ile
- Below average port (13th percentile)13th %ile
- Below average ram (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average gpu (18th percentile)18th %ile
ASUS Zenbook Duo 14" UX8406CA-PS99T Inkwell Gray 2025
- Strong screen (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong ram (91th percentile)91th %ile
- Strong cpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
Precios
Samsung0.009puntos por dólar
vs
ASUS Zenbook Duo 14" UX8406CA-PS99T Inkwell Gray 20250.005puntos por dólar
Samsung ofrece 1.8x mejor relación calidad-precio
Samsung
ASUS Zenbook Duo 14" UX8406CA-PS99T Inkwell Gray 2025
Veredicto
Ganador: ASUS Zenbook Duo 14" UX8406CA-PS99T
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 23 of 29 specs.
