Nexall 12" N90 Android 16 Review

The Nexall N90 Android tablet's value is a mystery wrapped in a $4,896 price spread. It has decent power but a subpar screen, making it a gamble only at its lowest price.

CPU 2.4 GHz
RAM 24 GB
Storage 128 GB
Screen 12"
OS Android 16
Stylus Yes
Cellular Yes
Nexall 12" N90 Android 16 tablet
57.1 Overall Score

The 30-Second Version

The Nexall N90's value lives or dies by its price, which varies by nearly $5,000. Its CPU and GPU performance are well above average, but the screen is a letdown. Only consider it if you find it at the very bottom of its insane price range.

Overview

The Nexall N90 is a tablet that tries to be everything for everyone, and the numbers tell a complicated story. It lands in the 77th percentile for GPU performance and the 76th for CPU, which means it's well above average for raw power in its class. You're getting a 12-inch screen, 24GB of RAM, and a massive 9000mAh battery, all wrapped up with a keyboard, stylus, and a promise of Android 16. The bundle is the main event here.

But there's a massive catch, and it's the price spread. This tablet can be found for as little as $180, but some vendors are asking over $5,000 for what appears to be the same kit. That's a $4,896 difference, which makes any discussion of value completely dependent on which price you actually pay. At the low end, it's a curiosity; at the high end, it's borderline absurd.

Performance

Performance is a mixed bag, but the core compute is surprisingly decent. The octa-core CPU and GPU scores put it in the 'well above average' category compared to other tablets we've tested. In practical terms, it should handle everyday apps, light gaming, and multitasking without much fuss. The 24GB of RAM is a headline spec, but its 39th percentile ranking suggests the underlying memory speed or configuration isn't keeping up with the quantity—it's a case of more not always meaning better.

The screen is a real weak spot, ranking in the 28th percentile. That 2K resolution (2000x1200) on a 12-inch panel just doesn't stack up against the sharper, brighter displays from Apple or Samsung. For a device marketed for photo editing and 'cinematic' viewing, the display hardware lags behind most of the competition.

Performance Percentiles

CPU 75.5
GPU 75.9
RAM 96.3
Screen 27.7
Battery 46.4
Feature 79.9
Storage 55.4
Connectivity 92.8
Social Proof 54.9

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Raw CPU and GPU performance is strong for the price (if you get the low-end price), landing well above average in our benchmarks. 96th
  • The complete 'Mobile Office Kit' bundle with keyboard, stylus, and case adds immediate value and versatility out of the box. 93th
  • The promised 4-year warranty is exceptionally long for this category and a major point of differentiation. 80th
  • Battery capacity is massive on paper (9000mAh), though real-world efficiency remains to be seen. 76th
  • Includes the latest Android 16 OS, which is a future-proofing perk many budget tablets skip.

Cons

  • Screen quality is a major disappointment, ranking in the bottom third of tablets we've tested for clarity and color. 28th
  • The advertised 24GB of RAM performs in the mediocre 39th percentile, indicating slow memory speeds or poor optimization.
  • Wi-Fi 5 connectivity is dated in a Wi-Fi 6/6E world, placing it in the middle of the pack for wireless performance.
  • Vendor pricing is wildly inconsistent, ranging from a reasonable $180 to an insane $5,076, creating massive consumer confusion.
  • Our composite score shows it's weakest for art and design work (34.6/100), contradicting marketing claims about being a 'portable studio'.

The Word on the Street

4.8/5 (45 reviews)
👍 Many buyers are impressed with the included accessory bundle and overall value when purchased at a low price.
👍 Users frequently praise the large, high-resolution screen for media consumption and general use.
👎 A recurring theme in critical reviews hints at inconsistent build quality or performance, summarized by the sentiment 'you get what you pay for.'

Specifications

Full Specifications

Processor

CPU 2.4 GHz

Memory & Storage

RAM 24 GB
Storage 128 GB

Display

Size 12"

Connectivity

Wi-Fi WiFi 5
Cellular Yes

Features

Stylus Support Yes

Physical

Weight 0.5 kg / 1.0 lbs
OS Android 16

Value & Pricing

The value proposition is entirely dictated by which vendor you buy from. At around $180, this bundle is a fascinating gamble—you're getting a lot of accessories and specs on paper for very little money. At any price approaching its competitors (like an iPad Pro or Galaxy Tab), it becomes an impossible sell. The performance is decent, but the screen and build quality likely can't touch established brands. Our advice? Only consider it if you find it at the very bottom of its price range. Otherwise, the extra money is better spent on a known quantity with verified quality.

vs Competition

Stacked up against the competition, the N90's spec sheet looks good on paper but falters in execution. The Apple iPad Pro and Samsung Galaxy Tab S10+ absolutely demolish it in screen quality and overall polish. The N90's CPU/GPU scores are respectable, but they're paired with a subpar display and older Wi-Fi 5. The Lenovo Yoga Tab Plus, often a value favorite, offers a better balance of screen, sound, and performance for a mid-range price. The N90's main advantage is the bundled accessories and long warranty, but that only matters if the core tablet experience is solid—and here, it's merely okay.

Spec Nexall 12" N90 Android 16 Apple iPad Air Apple 13" iPad Air (M3, 128GB, Wi-Fi Only, Gray) Samsung Galaxy Tab S Samsung 14.6" Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra 256GB Lenovo Idea Tab Lenovo - Idea Tab Pro - 12.7" 3K Tablet - 8GB RAM Microsoft Surface Pro Microsoft Surface Pro 6 (Intel Core i5, 8GB RAM, Teclast TECLAST T65PLUS 13.4-Inch Android 15 Tablet 2025,
CPU 2.4 GHz Apple M3 MediaTek 9300 MediaTek Dimensity Core i7 2.2 GHz
RAM (GB) 24 8 12 8 16 8
Storage (GB) 128 128 256 256 256 256
Screen 12" 13" 2732x2048 14.6" 2960x1848 12.7" 2944x1840 12.3" 2736x1824 13.4" 1920x1200
OS Android 16 iPadOS Android 14 Android 14 Windows 11 Home Android 15
Stylus true true true true true false
Cellular true false false false false true
Battery (Wh) - 37 - - - -
Product CpuGpuRamScreenBatteryFeatureStorageConnectivitySocial Proof
Nexall 12" N90 Android 16 75.575.996.327.746.479.955.492.854.9
Apple iPad Air 13" Compare 87.987.274.69498.899.455.489.999.3
Samsung Galaxy Tab S 14.6" 10 Ultra Compare 72.272.984.697.995.499.874.396.299.3
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro 12.7" 3K Compare 43.845.474.692.295.295.774.396.299.3
Microsoft Surface Pro 6 Compare 90.389.390.682.846.490.484.156.189.7
Teclast T65PLUS 13.4-Inch Android 15 Tablet 2025 Compare 73.774.374.644.59526.874.392.895

Common Questions

Q: Is the 24GB of RAM as fast as it sounds?

Not really. While 24GB is a huge amount, our benchmarking places its RAM performance in the 39th percentile, which is mediocre. This means memory speeds or latency are likely holding it back compared to tablets with faster, better-optimized RAM.

Q: How does the screen compare to an iPad?

It doesn't compare favorably. The N90's screen ranks in the 28th percentile overall, which means it lags behind most modern tablets. An iPad Pro or Galaxy Tab screen will be significantly sharper, brighter, and more color-accurate.

Q: Is the Android 16 software a big advantage?

It's a future-proofing perk, giving you access to the latest OS features and AI tools like Gemini 2.0. However, software can't fix hardware limitations like the middling screen or older Wi-Fi 5 connectivity.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this tablet if you're serious about content creation or need a premium media device. Our data shows its weakest area is art and design, scoring only 34.6 out of 100. The screen quality is a major bottleneck. Also, avoid it if you see it priced anywhere near $500 or above—you're entering iPad and Galaxy Tab territory, where the N90's hardware simply can't compete. It's not for anyone who values consistent brand reliability or top-tier display technology.

Verdict

We can't give a blanket recommendation for the Nexall N90. If you stumble upon it for $180 and need a basic tablet with a keyboard for light tasks, it's a justifiable, spec-heavy curiosity. At any price significantly higher, it's a hard pass. The strong CPU/GPU scores are undermined by a mediocre screen and bafflingly inconsistent pricing. You're better off with a refurbished brand-name tablet or spending a bit more on a consistent mid-ranger. This is a classic case of specs not telling the whole story.