KAIGERR 16" TX16PRO Portable Gray 2025

KAIGERR 16" TX16PRO Portable Gray 2025

KAIGERR
51 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024

Acer
77 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
KAIGERR
14
Acer
88
Creator
KAIGERR
24
Acer
86
Entertainment
KAIGERR
51
Acer
85
Developer
KAIGERR
46
Acer
74
Student
KAIGERR
49
Acer
66
Business
KAIGERR
45
Acer
65
Compact
KAIGERR
43
Acer
54

Spezifikationen

KAIGERR 16" TX16PROAcer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 7 7730UIntel Core Ultra 7 165H
CPU Multi-Core Score
18,138
25,914
Cores816
Frequency4.5 GHz2.3 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB24 MB
Graphics
GPU*Radeon RX Vega 8NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GPU Benchmark Score
1,540
26,912
Typediscrete
VRAM16 GB8 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR6
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4LPDDR5X
Storage 1512 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDNVMe SSD
Display
Size16"16"
Resolution1920 px3200 px
PanelIPSIPS
Refresh Rate165 Hz
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports23
ThunderboltThunderbolt 4
HDMIHDMIHDMI 2.1
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6E
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3
Physical
Weight1.75 kg2.05 kg
OSWindows 11Windows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

KAIGERR 16" TX16PRO Portable Gray 2025

  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
  • Below average compact (28th percentile)

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Silver 2024

  • Strong screen (92th percentile)92th %ile
  • Strong port (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong social proof (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong gpu (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average reliability (9th percentile)9th %ile
  • Below average compact (17th percentile)17th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N

Scores 77 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 26 specs.

Acer Predator Triton Neo 16" PTN16-51-932N Besser bei:

GamingCompactCreatorStudentBusinessDeveloperEntertainment