Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
Razer
67 التقييم العام
مقابل
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
ASUS
63 التقييم العام
التقييمات
Gaming
Entertainment
Creator
Compact
Developer
Student
Business
المواصفات
| Razer Blade Blade 14 | ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 | Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 Processor (30MB Cache, 2.97GHz, 8 cores, 8 Threads); Qualcomm Hexagon NPU up to 45TOPS |
| Cores | 10★ | 8 |
| Frequency | 2.0 GHz | 3.0 GHz★ |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB★ | — |
| Graphics | ||
| GPU* | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070★ | Qualcomm Adreno GPU |
| GPU Benchmark Score | ||
| Type | discrete | integrated★ |
| VRAM | 8 GB★ | — |
| VRAM Type | GDDR7 | Shared |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 32 GB★ | 16 GB |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5X★ |
| Storage 1 | 1 TB★ | 512 GB |
| Storage 1 Type | SSD | NVMe SSD★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 14" | 16" |
| Resolution | 2560 px★ | 1920 px |
| Panel | OLED★ | IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 120 Hz★ | 60 Hz |
| Brightness | — | 300 nits★ |
| Color Gamut | — | 45% NTSC |
| Connectivity | ||
| USB-C Ports | 2 | 2 |
| USB Ports | — | 2★ |
| HDMI | — | HDMI 2.1 |
| Wi-Fi | — | Wi-Fi 6E★ |
| Bluetooth | — | Bluetooth 5.3★ |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 1.63 kg★ | 1.88 kg |
| Battery | 72 Wh★ | 50 Wh |
| OS | Windows 11 Home | Windows 11 Home |
الإيجابيات والسلبيات
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
- Strong gpu (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong screen (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong cpu (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong ram (73th percentile)
- Below average reliability (3th percentile)3th %ile
- Below average port (22th percentile)
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
- Strong cpu (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong ram (67th percentile)
- Below average compact (22th percentile)
الأسعار
Razer Blade Blade 14 20250.002نقاط لكل دولار
مقابل
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue0.009نقاط لكل دولار
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue يقدم قيمة أفضل بـ 4.5x مقابل المال
Razer Blade Blade 14 2025
ASUS Vivobook 16" X1607 Quiet Blue
الحكم النهائي
الفائز: Razer Blade Blade 14
Scores 67 overall, wins 6 of 7 usage categories and 12 of 27 specs.
